JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Delgado-Bolton, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Carreras, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Delgado-Bolton, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Carreras, J. L.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 44 No. 8 1301-1314
© 2003 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


Basic Science Investigations

Meta-Analysis of the Performance of 18F-FDG PET in Primary Tumor Detection in Unknown Primary Tumors

Roberto C. Delgado-Bolton, MD1, Cristina Fernández-Pérez, MD2, Alfredo González-Maté, MD1 and José L. Carreras, MD, PhD1

1 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
2 Research Unit, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain

Detection of the primary tumor has a key role in the management of patients with unknown primary tumors (UPT). The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of the literature to evaluate the accuracy of 18F-FDG PET in primary tumor detection in patients with UPT. Methods: Systematic methods were used to identify, select, and evaluate the methodologic quality of the studies as well as to summarize the overall findings of sensitivity, specificity, and detection capacity of the primary tumor. The search strategy consisted of identifying studies published between January 1994 and May 2001 indexed in MEDLINE and CANCERLIT. Studies identified by manually searching reference lists of retrieved studies or by reviewing abstracts from recent conference proceedings were also included. Inclusion criteria were studies that evaluated primary tumor detection with 18F-FDG PET in patients with UPT. Exclusion criteria were duplicated studies or those outdated by subsequent ones. The statistical analysis included 95% confidence intervals (CI) of sensitivity and specificity, both in the pooled data and in the types of studies found. Variation in accuracy between studies was analyzed calculating the natural logarithm of the odds ratio (ln OR) due to study characteristics. Funnel plots of sensitivity and specificity and the summary receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curve were also represented. Results: Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Although sample sizes were small, compliance with the methodologic quality criteria was adequate. Heterogeneity analysis showed that differences in the study quality did not correlate with differences in study results. The 95% CI of sensitivity and specificity presented global homogeneity, estimating the sensitivity at 0.87 (95% CI, 0.81–0.92) and the specificity at 0.71 (95% CI, 0.64–0.78). The summary ROC curve showed a good relationship between sensitivity and specificity. The ln OR presented significant values in >75% of the studies. Conclusion: 18F-FDG PET could be useful in patients with UPT for the detection of the primary tumor. 18F-FDG PET has intermediate specificity and high sensitivity, indicating the existence of few false-negative results, an important feature in the management of oncologic patients that could suggest its utility in the initial stages of the management process.

Key Words: neoplasms • unknown primary • 18F-FDG PET • meta-analysis • carcinoma of unknown primary syndrome




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
J. W. Fletcher, B. Djulbegovic, H. P. Soares, B. A. Siegel, V. J. Lowe, G. H. Lyman, R. E. Coleman, R. Wahl, J. C. Paschold, N. Avril, et al.
Recommendations on the Use of 18F-FDG PET in Oncology
J. Nucl. Med., March 1, 2008; 49(3): 480 - 508.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
S. Tsukushi, H. Katagiri, T. Kataoka, Y. Nishida, and N. Ishiguro
Serum Tumor Markers in Skeletal Metastasis
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., July 1, 2006; 36(7): 439 - 444.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
S. K. Mukherji and C. R. Bradford
Controversies: Is There a Role for Positron-Emission Tomographic CT in the Initial Staging of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma?
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2006; 27(2): 243 - 245.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2003 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.