JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Soret, M.
Right arrow Articles by Buvat, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Soret, M.
Right arrow Articles by Buvat, I.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 44 No. 7 1184-1193
© 2003 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


Basic Science Investigations

Quantitative Accuracy of Dopaminergic Neurotransmission Imaging with 123I SPECT

Marine Soret, MSc1, Pierre Malick Koulibaly, PhD2, Jacques Darcourt, MD, PhD2, Sébastien Hapdey, PhD1 and Irène Buvat, PhD1

1 Unité 494, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
2 Médecine Nucléaire, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Laboratoire de Biophysique et Traitement de l’Image, Université de Nice–Sophia Antipolis, Nice, France

123I-Labeled radiotracers are suitable for in vivo imaging of the dopaminergic system by SPECT. However, precise measurement of striatal uptake is limited by scatter, attenuation, and the finite spatial resolution of the camera. We studied the quantitative accuracy that can be achieved with 123I SPECT of the dopaminergic neurotransmission system. Methods: Using a Monte Carlo simulation and brain phantom experiments, we studied the biases in brain and striatal absolute uptake estimates and in binding potential (BP) values for different processing schemes with corrections for attenuation, scatter, and the partial-volume effect. Results: Without any correction, brain activity was underestimated by at least 65%, and absolute striatal activity measured in regions corresponding to the anatomic contours of the striata was underestimated by about 90%. With scatter and attenuation corrections only, estimated brain activity was accurate within 10%; however, striatal activity remained underestimated by about 50%, and BP values were underestimated by more than 50%. When combined with attenuation and scatter corrections, anatomically guided partial-volume effect correction (PVC) reduced the biases in striatal activity estimates and in BP values to about 10%. PVC reliability was affected by errors in registering SPECT with anatomic images, in segmenting anatomic images, and in estimating the spatial resolution. With registration errors of 1 voxel (2.1 x 2.1 x 3.6 mm3) in all directions and of 15° around the axial direction, PVC still improved the accuracy of striatal activity and BP estimates compared with scatter and attenuation corrections alone, the errors being within 25%. A 50% overestimation of the striatal volume yielded an approximate 30% change in striatal activity estimates with respect to no overestimation but still provided striatal activity estimates that were more accurate than those obtained without PVC (average errors ± 1 SD were -22.5% ± 1.0% with PVC and -49.0% ± 5.5% without PVC). A 2-mm error in the spatial resolution estimate changed the striatal activity and BP estimates by no more than 10%. Conclusion: Accurate estimates of striatal uptake and BP in 123I brain SPECT are feasible with PVC, even with small errors in registering SPECT with anatomic data or in segmenting the striata.

Key Words: brain imaging • dopaminergic system • SPECT • 123I • partial-volume correction




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
M. Soret, S. L. Bacharach, and I. Buvat
Partial-Volume Effect in PET Tumor Imaging
J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2007; 48(6): 932 - 945.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
W. Koch, C. Hamann, J. Welsch, G. Popperl, P. E. Radau, and K. Tatsch
Is Iterative Reconstruction an Alternative to Filtered Backprojection in Routine Processing of Dopamine Transporter SPECT Studies?
J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2005; 46(11): 1804 - 1811.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2003 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.