JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kolbert, K. S.
Right arrow Articles by Sgouros, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kolbert, K. S.
Right arrow Articles by Sgouros, G.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 44 No. 5 784-791
© 2003 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


Basic Science Investigations

Murine S Factors for Liver, Spleen, and Kidney

Katherine S. Kolbert, MS1, Timotheus Watson, BS1, Cornelia Matei, SB1, Su Xu, PhD1, Jason A. Koutcher, MD, PhD1 and George Sgouros, PhD1

1 Imaging and Spectroscopic Physics Service, Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York

Preclinical evaluation of new radiopharmaceuticals is performed in animal systems before testing is started in humans. These studies, often performed in murine or other rodent models, are important in understanding the relationship between absorbed dose and response, which can be translated to preclinical results for humans. In performing such calculations, either electrons are assumed to deposit all of their energy locally or idealized models of mouse anatomy are used to determine absorbed fractions. Photon contributions are generally considered negligible. To improve the accuracy of such absorbed dose calculations, mouse-specific S factors for 131I, 153Sm, 32P, 188Re, and 90Y have been generated, and the photon and electron portions have been tabulated separately. Absorbed fractions for 5 monoenergetic electrons, ranging in energy from 0.5 to 2 MeV, are also provided. Methods: Female athymic mouse MR images were obtained on a 4.7-T MRI device. Fifteen T1-weighted, 1.5-mm-thick slices (0.5-mm gap) were collected. Using a previously developed software package, 3-dimensional Internal Dosimetry (3D-ID), organ contours were drawn to obtain a 3-dimensional representation of liver, kidneys, and spleen. Using a point-kernel convolution, the mean absorbed dose to each organ from the individual contributions of each source organ were calculated. S factor equivalent values were obtained by assuming a uniform distribution of radioactivity in each organ. Results were validated by comparing 3D-ID generated electron S factors for different-sized spheres with published data. Depending on matrix size, sphere size, and radionuclide, 1% (2562 matrix) to 18% (642 matrix) agreement was obtained. Results: S factor values were calculated for liver, spleen, and right and left kidneys. Cross-organ electron-absorbed fractions of up to 0.33 were obtained (e.g., 90Y right kidney to liver). Comparisons between S factor values and values obtained assuming complete absorption of electron energy yielded differences of more than 190% (90Y spleen self-dose). Conclusion: The effect of cross-organ and self-absorbed dose is dependent on emission energy and organ geometry and should be considered in murine dose estimates. The approach used to generate these S factors is applicable to other animal systems and also to nonuniform activity distributions that may be obtained by small-animal SPECT or PET imaging or by quantitative autoradiography.

Key Words: S factors • murine model • dosimetry • 90Y • 131I • 153Sm • 32P • 188Re • monoenergetic electron




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
M. A. Keenan, M. G. Stabin, W. P. Segars, and M. J. Fernald
RADAR Realistic Animal Model Series for Dose Assessment
J. Nucl. Med., March 1, 2010; 51(3): 471 - 476.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
M. G. Stabin, T. E. Peterson, G. E. Holburn, and M. A. Emmons
Voxel-Based Mouse and Rat Models for Internal Dose Calculations
J. Nucl. Med., April 1, 2006; 47(4): 655 - 659.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
D. Berndorff, S. Borkowski, S. Sieger, A. Rother, M. Friebe, F. Viti, C. S. Hilger, J. E. Cyr, and L. M. Dinkelborg
Radioimmunotherapy of Solid Tumors by Targeting Extra Domain B Fibronectin: Identification of the Best-Suited Radioimmunoconjugate
Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2005; 11(19): 7053s - 7063s.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
C. Hindorf, M. Ljungberg, and S.-E. Strand
Evaluation of Parameters Influencing S Values in Mouse Dosimetry
J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2004; 45(11): 1960 - 1965.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
M. W. Konijnenberg, M. Bijster, E. P. Krenning, and M. de Jong
A Stylized Computational Model of the Rat for Organ Dosimetry in Support of Preclinical Evaluations of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy with 90Y, 111In, or 177Lu
J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2004; 45(7): 1260 - 1269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
N.-K. V. Cheung, S. Modak, Y. Lin, H. Guo, P. Zanzonico, J. Chung, Y. Zuo, J. Sanderson, S. Wilbert, L. J. Theodore, et al.
Single-Chain Fv-Streptavidin Substantially Improved Therapeutic Index in Multistep Targeting Directed at Disialoganglioside GD2
J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2004; 45(5): 867 - 877.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
S. Palm, R. M. Enmon Jr., C. Matei, K. S. Kolbert, S. Xu, P. B. Zanzonico, R. L. Finn, J. A. Koutcher, S. M. Larson, and G. Sgouros
Pharmacokinetics and Biodistribution of 86Y-Trastuzumab for 90Y Dosimetry in an Ovarian Carcinoma Model: Correlative MicroPET and MRI
J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2003; 44(7): 1148 - 1155.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2003 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.