JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hayashi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Shirane, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hayashi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Shirane, R.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 44 No. 4 565-569
© 2003 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


Brief Communications

Inflammatory Demyelinating Disease Mimicking Malignant Glioma

Toshiaki Hayashi, MD1, Toshihiro Kumabe, MD1, Hidefumi Jokura, MD1, Kazuo Fujihara, MD2, Yusei Shiga, MD2, Mika Watanabe, MD3, Shu-ichi Higano, MD4 and Reizo Shirane, MD1

1 Department of Neurosurgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
2 Department of Neurology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
3 Department of Pathology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
4 Department of Radiology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan

ABSTRACT

The differential diagnosis between inflammatory demyelinating disease and malignant glioma is difficult based only on neuroimaging methods. Methods: Four patients with inflammatory demyelinating disease who presented with clinical and neuroimaging findings strongly suggestive of malignant glioma were examined. Results: MRI showed a mass lesion with prolonged T1 and T2 values and gadolinium enhancement in all cases. Proton MR spectroscopy and 201Tl SPECT showed findings supportive of the diagnosis of malignant glioma in all cases. However, surgical biopsy revealed inflammatory demyelinating disease. After the diagnosis, 2 patients were treated by steroid administration and 2 were just observed. The gadolinium enhancement of all lesions decreased and finally disappeared. Conclusion: Such cases illustrate the importance of considering a demyelinating lesion in the differential diagnosis of a mass lesion. The difficulties encountered in establishing the correct diagnosis of inflammatory disease are related to the variations in the radiologic appearance, which require exclusion of gliomas or other brain tumors by surgical biopsy before the therapeutic strategy can be selected.

Key Words: inflammatory demyelinating disease • malignant glioma • proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy • 201Tl SPECT




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BrainHome page
C. F. Lucchinetti, R. H. Gavrilova, I. Metz, J. E. Parisi, B. W. Scheithauer, S. Weigand, K. Thomsen, J. Mandrekar, A. Altintas, B. J. Erickson, et al.
Clinical and radiographic spectrum of pathologically confirmed tumefactive multiple sclerosis
Brain, July 1, 2008; 131(7): 1759 - 1775.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2003 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.