| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | RSS | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
||||||||
|
||||||||||
Clinical Investigations |
1 Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
2 The Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
3 Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
4 Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
Patients with rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels after definitive local therapy of prostate carcinoma present a diagnostic dilemma. A local recurrence would be amenable to additional local therapy with curative intent, whereas metastatic disease would require palliative androgen ablation therapy. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of PET with 11C-acetate (AC PET) for evaluation of patients with rising PSA after radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy. We also compared the reliability of AC PET in detecting recurrent prostate cancer with that of PET with 18F-FDG. Methods: Two groups of patients with PSA recurrence were enrolled in this study: group A, 30 patients after prostatectomy, and group B, 16 patients after radiation therapy. After administration of 1,110 MBq (30 mCi) of 11C-acetate, whole-body PET images were obtained. After allowing for 11C decay, 555 MBq (15 mCi) of 18F-FDG were administered and repeated whole-body imaging was performed. The PET findings were scored as positive or negative in each of the following regions: prostatic bed, pelvic nodes, paraaortic nodes, and other sites (bone or soft tissue). PET findings were correlated with those of CT, bone scintigraphy, and biopsy. Results: Twenty-seven of 46 AC PET studies (59%) had positive findings, whereas only 8 18F-FDG PET studies had positive findings (17%). Limiting the analysis to patients with findings confirmed by CT, bone scintigraphy, or biopsy or considered highly likely to represent tumor, 14 (30%) had disease identified by AC PET, whereas only 4 (9%) had disease identified by 18F-FDG PET. CT was performed on 22 patients and had positive findings in 3 (14%). Thirteen of 22 patients (59%) with serum PSA > 3 ng/mL had positive AC PET findings, whereas only 1 of 24 patients (4%) with serum PSA levels 
3 ng/mL had positive findings. Conclusion: AC PET demonstrates marked uptake in prostate cancer and has higher sensitivity than 18F-FDG PET. These preliminary data show that 11C-acetate is a promising tracer for detection of recurrent prostate cancer.
Key Words: prostate cancer • PET • 11C-acetate
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  G. J. Kelloff, P. Choyke, D. S. Coffey, and for The Prostate Cancer Imaging Working Group Challenges in Clinical Prostate Cancer: Role of Imaging Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2009; 192(6): 1455 - 1470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Turkbey, P. S. Albert, K. Kurdziel, and P. L. Choyke Imaging Localized Prostate Cancer: Current Approaches and New Developments Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2009; 192(6): 1471 - 1480. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. P.S. Dunphy and J. S. Lewis Radiopharmaceuticals in Preclinical and Clinical Development for Monitoring of Therapy with PET J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2009; 50(Suppl_1): 106S - 121S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Plathow and W. A. Weber Tumor Cell Metabolism Imaging J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2008; 49(Suppl_2): 43S - 63S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. J. Anker, C. Dechet, J. C. Isaac, W. Akerley, and D. C. Shrieve Small-Cell Carcinoma of the Prostate J. Clin. Oncol., March 1, 2008; 26(7): 1168 - 1171. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. L. Vavere, S. J. Kridel, F. B. Wheeler, and J. S. Lewis 1-11C-Acetate as a PET Radiopharmaceutical for Imaging Fatty Acid Synthase Expression in Prostate Cancer J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2008; 49(2): 327 - 334. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Schiepers, C. K. Hoh, J. Nuyts, M. Seltzer, C. Wu, S.-C. Huang, and M. Dahlbom 1-11C-Acetate Kinetics of Prostate Cancer J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2008; 49(2): 206 - 215. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. J. A. Margolis, J. M. Hoffman, R. J. Herfkens, R. B. Jeffrey, A. Quon, and S. S. Gambhir Molecular Imaging Techniques in Body Imaging Radiology, November 1, 2007; 245(2): 333 - 356. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. B. Jani, S. L. Liauw, and M. J. Blend The Role of Indium-111 Radioimmunoscintigraphy in Post-Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy Management of Prostate Cancer Patients Clin. Med. Res., June 1, 2007; 5(2): 123 - 131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. E. Ponde, C. S. Dence, N. Oyama, J. Kim, Y.-C. Tai, R. Laforest, B. A. Siegel, and M. J. Welch 18F-Fluoroacetate: A Potential Acetate Analog for Prostate Tumor Imaging--In Vivo Evaluation of 18F-Fluoroacetate Versus 11C-Acetate J. Nucl. Med., March 1, 2007; 48(3): 420 - 428. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. M. Schuster, J. R. Votaw, P. T. Nieh, W. Yu, J. A. Nye, V. Master, F. D. Bowman, M. M. Issa, and M. M. Goodman Initial Experience with the Radiotracer Anti-1-Amino-3-18F-Fluorocyclobutane-1-Carboxylic Acid with PET/CT in Prostate Carcinoma J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2007; 48(1): 56 - 63. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Wachter, S. Tomek, A. Kurtaran, N. Wachter-Gerstner, B. Djavan, A. Becherer, M. Mitterhauser, G. Dobrozemsky, S. Li, R. Potter, et al. 11C-Acetate Positron Emission Tomography Imaging and Image Fusion With Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Recurrent Prostate Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., June 1, 2006; 24(16): 2513 - 2519. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. B. Hayes and A. Pollack Parameters for Treatment Decisions for Salvage Radiation Therapy J. Clin. Oncol., November 10, 2005; 23(32): 8204 - 8211. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. Schoder, K. Herrmann, M. Gonen, H. Hricak, S. Eberhard, P. Scardino, H. I. Scher, and S. M. Larson 2-[18F]Fluoro-2-Deoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography for the Detection of Disease in Patients with Prostate-Specific Antigen Relapse after Radical Prostatectomy Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2005; 11(13): 4761 - 4769. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
X. Chen, R. Park, Y. Hou, M. Tohme, A. H. Shahinian, J. R. Bading, and P. S. Conti microPET and Autoradiographic Imaging of GRP Receptor Expression with 64Cu-DOTA-[Lys3]Bombesin in Human Prostate Adenocarcinoma Xenografts J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2004; 45(8): 1390 - 1397. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. A. Seltzer, S. A. Jahan, R. Sparks, D. B. Stout, N. Satyamurthy, M. Dahlbom, M. E. Phelps, and J. R. Barrio Radiation Dose Estimates in Humans for 11C-Acetate Whole-Body PET J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2004; 45(7): 1233 - 1236. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss and L. G. Strauss PET Imaging of Prostate Cancer with 11C-Acetate J. Nucl. Med., April 1, 2003; 44(4): 556 - 558. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | RSS | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY | THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE |
