JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hustinx, R.
Right arrow Articles by Luxen, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hustinx, R.
Right arrow Articles by Luxen, A.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 44 No. 4 533-539
© 2003 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


Clinical Investigations

Whole-Body Tumor Imaging Using PET and 2-18F-Fluoro-L-Tyrosine: Preliminary Evaluation and Comparison with 18F-FDG

Roland Hustinx, MD, PhD1, Christian Lemaire, PhD2, Guy Jerusalem, MD3, Pierre Moreau, MD4, Didier Cataldo, MD5, Bernard Duysinx, MD5, Joel Aerts, MS2, Marie-France Fassotte, MD3, Jacqueline Foidart, MD1 and André Luxen, PhD2

1 Division of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Liège, Belgium
2 Cyclotron Research Center, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
3 Division of Hematology-Oncology, University Hospital, Liège, Belgium
4 Department of Otolaryngology, University Hospital, Liège, Belgium
5 Division of Pulmonary Medicine, University Hospital, Liège, Belgium

18F-FDG PET imaging is now established as a valuable tool for evaluating cancer patients. However, a limitation of 18F-FDG is its absence of specificity for tumor. Both protein synthesis and amino acid transport are enhanced in most tumor cells, but their metabolism is less affected in inflammation. We therefore decided to evaluate the ability of PET with 2-18F-fluoro-L-tyrosine (18F-TYR) to visualize cancer lesions in patients compared with 18F-FDG PET. Methods: 18F-FDG PET and 18F-TYR PET were performed on 23 patients with histologically proven malignancies (11 non–small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs), 10 lymphomas, and 2 head and neck carcinomas). Fully corrected, whole-body PET studies were obtained on separate days. 18F-FDG studies were performed after routine clinical fashion. 18F-TYR studies were started 36 ± 6 min after tracer injection and a second scan centered over a reference lesion was acquired after completion of the whole-body survey—on average, 87 min after injection. Standardized uptake values (SUVs) were calculated for all abnormal foci and for various normal structures. Results were compared with pathologic or correlative studies. Results: 18F-FDG PET correctly identified 54 malignant lesions, among which 36 were also visualized with 18F-TYR (67%). 18F-TYR did not detect any additional lesion. Tumor SUVs (SUVbw, 5.2 vs. 2.5), tumor-to-muscle (7.4 vs. 2.7), and tumor-to-mediastinum activity ratios (3 vs. 1.4) were higher with 18F-FDG than with 18F-TYR. Two of 11 NSCLCs and 4 of 10 lymphomas were understaged with 18F-TYR compared with 18F-FDG. Although the NSCLC lesions missed by 18F-TYR PET were small, several large lymphoma lesions did not accumulate the tracer. In 4 patients, 18F-TYR–positive lesions coexisted with 18F-TYR–negative lesions. There was a high physiologic 18F-TYR uptake by the pancreas (average SUVbw, 10.3) and the liver (average SUVbw, 6.3). Muscle and bone marrow uptakes were also higher with 18F-TYR than with 18F-FDG: average SUVbw, 1 versus 0.7 and 2.6 versus 1.8, respectively. There was no change over time in the 18F-TYR uptake by the tumors or the normal structures. Conclusion: 18F-TYR PET is not superior to 18F-FDG PET for staging patients with NSCLC and lymphomas.

Key Words: 2-18F-fluoro-L-tyrosine • 18F-FDG • PET • cancer • protein synthesis




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
I. Rutten, J.-E. Cabay, N. Withofs, C. Lemaire, J. Aerts, V. Baart, and R. Hustinx
PET/CT of Skull Base Meningiomas Using 2-18F-Fluoro-L-Tyrosine: Initial Report
J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2007; 48(5): 720 - 725.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
D. Pauleit, G. Stoffels, W. Schaden, K. Hamacher, D. Bauer, L. Tellmann, H. Herzog, S. Broer, H. H. Coenen, and K.-J. Langen
PET with O-(2-18F-Fluoroethyl)-L-Tyrosine in Peripheral Tumors: First Clinical Results
J. Nucl. Med., March 1, 2005; 46(3): 411 - 416.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
T. Lahoutte, V. Caveliers, S. M.R. Camargo, R. Franca, T. Ramadan, E. Veljkovic, J. Mertens, A. Bossuyt, and F. Verrey
SPECT and PET Amino Acid Tracer Influx via System L (h4F2hc-hLAT1) and Its Transstimulation
J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2004; 45(9): 1591 - 1596.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
J. W. Friedberg and V. Chengazi
PET Scans in the Staging of Lymphoma: Current Status
Oncologist, October 1, 2003; 8(5): 438 - 447.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2003 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.