JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brenner, W.
Right arrow Articles by Henze, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brenner, W.
Right arrow Articles by Henze, E.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 44 No. 2 247-251
© 2003 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


Basic Science Investigations

Bone Uptake Studies in Rabbits Before and After High-Dose Treatment with 153Sm-EDTMP or 186Re-HEDP

Winfried Brenner, MD, Willm Uwe Kampen, MD, Corinna Brümmer, MD, Corinna von Forstner, MD, Maaz Zuhayra, PhD, Norbert Czech, MD, Claus Muhle, MD and Eberhard Henze, MD

Clinic of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Kiel, Kiel, Germany

The aim of this animal study was to measure the bone uptake of 99mTc-hydroxymethylene diphosphonate (HDP) before and after high-dose treatment with 153Sm-ethylenediaminetetramethylenephosphonate (EDTMP) or 186Re-(tin)1,1-hydroxyethylidene diphosphonate (HEDP) to prove or disprove post-therapeutic alterations of bone uptake of radiolabeled bisphosphonates. Methods: Quantitative bone scanning using 100 MBq 99mTc-HDP was performed on 12 rabbits before and 8 wk after radionuclide therapy with 1,000 MBq of either 153Sm-EDTMP or 186Re-HEDP. Whole-body images were acquired at 3 min, 3 h, and 24 h after injection, and the activities for the whole body, urinary bladder, and soft tissue were measured by region-of-interest technique. From these data, bone uptake was calculated as initial whole-body activity minus urinary excretion and remainder soft-tissue activity. Results: In animals treated with 153Sm-EDTMP (n = 6), no differences could be proven for the bone uptake of 99mTc-HDP at 24 h after injection before and after therapy (51.1% ± 5.5% vs. 48.0% ± 6.1%, P > 0.05). There were also no significant differences for the remainder soft-tissue activities and the urinary excretion rates before and after therapy. Similar results were obtained in rabbits treated with 186Re-HEDP: Bone uptake (44.8% ± 6.7% vs. 40.4% ± 4.9%, P > 0.05) and urinary excretion revealed no significant differences before and after treatment. Conclusion: No significant impairment of bone uptake of 99mTc-HDP could be observed 8 wk after high-dose radionuclide bone therapy. Because both the biokinetic data obtained for 186Re-HEDP and 153Sm-EDTMP and the myelotoxic effects were quite similar in rabbits to those in patients, it seems justifiable to expect the same result (i.e., no significant alteration of bone uptake of radiolabeled bisphosphonates) in patients undergoing a second radionuclide therapy within 2–3 mo after standard treatment with 186Re-HEDP or 153Sm-EDTMP.

Key Words: 99mTc-hydroxymethylene diphosphonate • 186Re-(tin)1,1-hydroxyethylidene diphosphonate • 153Sm-ethylenediaminetetramethylenephosphonate • bone uptake • post-therapeutic alterations







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2003 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.