JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME Activity
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barron, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, E. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barron, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, E. E.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 44 No. 11 1818-1826
© 2003 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


Continuing Education

Ethical Dilemmas in Today’s Nuclear Medicine and Radiology Practice*

Bruce J. Barron, MD, MHA1 and E. Edmund Kim, MD2

1 Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine, University of Texas-Houston Medical School, Houston, Texas
2 Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas

Throughout history, societies have developed their own codes of ethics, including those pertaining to the practice of medicine. In the United States, physicians have adopted a set of ethics based on religious values and historical teachings. We, as physicians, have been presented several codes of ethics, including the American Medical Association Code of Ethics and the American College of Radiology Code of Ethics. Over time, we have learned to appropriately apply these codes to our daily practice. With the advent of new technologies in imaging, we may lose sight as to the transfer of these principles to reflect current conditions. Recent history has shown a trend of new technology leading to potential misuse of this technology and further leading to stricter governmental regulations. It is the purpose of this review to give guidelines for dealing with new technologies, such as PET imaging, and we describe a radiologist’s ethical responsibility in a doctor-patient relationship. A historical review of medical ethics will lead to discussions about various issues affecting radiologists and nuclear physicians. To be sure, not all ethical situations are black and white, and therefore there are many gray areas. The opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and are based on extension of already established rules of ethical conduct.

Key Words: medical ethics • PET • nuclear medicine • radiology




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. Raymond and I. Trop
The Practice of Ethics in the Era of Evidence-based Radiology
Radiology, September 1, 2007; 244(3): 643 - 649.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2003 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.