JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mankoff, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Livingston, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mankoff, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Livingston, R. B.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 44 No. 11 1806-1814
© 2003 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


Clinical Investigations

Changes in Blood Flow and Metabolism in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

David A. Mankoff, MD, PhD1, Lisa K. Dunnwald, BS1, Julie R. Gralow, MD2, Georgiana K. Ellis, MD2, Erin K. Schubert, BA1, Jeffrey Tseng, MD1, Thomas J. Lawton, MD3, Hannah M. Linden, MD2 and Robert B. Livingston, MD2

1 Division of Nuclear Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
2 Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
3 Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) is commonly treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by definitive surgery. The factors influencing the response of LABC to presurgical chemotherapy are incompletely understood. To characterize in vivo tumor biology in patients with LABC, we performed serial measurements of blood flow and glucose metabolism in LABC patients over the course of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and compared measurements with response. Methods: Thirty-five patients with newly diagnosed LABC underwent 18F-FDG and 15O-water PET imaging before therapy and after 2 mo of chemotherapy. Tumor metabolism was estimated from graphical analysis of dynamic 18F-FDG studies and was expressed as the metabolic rate of 18F-FDG (MRFDG). Blood flow was estimated from dynamic images after bolus 15O-water injection using a 1-compartment model. Metabolism and blood flow data were analyzed with and without partial-volume corrections to account for changes in tumor size over the course of therapy. Changes in tumor blood flow and metabolism were compared with response to chemotherapy and with patient survival. Results: For all patients, the mean MRFDG after 2 mo of chemotherapy decreased by 54% and the mean blood flow by 21%. Responders showed a greater decline in MRFDG than did nonresponders; however, the difference was of borderline significance (P = 0.05) after correction for partial-volume effects. Patients who responded had a decline in tumor blood flow, whereas nonresponders had an average increase (-32% vs. +48%, P < 0.005); the difference between responders and nonresponders remained significant after partial-volume correction (P < 0.01). There was also a statistically significant association between the pathologic degree of response and the percentage change in blood flow at 2 mo with and without partial-volume correction; this was not the case for MRFDG. The change in blood flow after 2 mo of therapy predicted disease-free and overall survival. Conclusion: Although both resistant and responsive LABC tumors have an average decline in MRFDG over the course of chemotherapy, resistant tumors have an average increase in blood flow. Patients whose tumors fail to have a decline in blood flow after 2 mo of therapy have poorer disease-free and overall survival. Further investigations are needed to elucidate the tumor biology underlying these findings.

Key Words: PET • neoadjuvant chemotherapy • breast cancer • 18F-FDG • 15O-water • response




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
K. McLarty, A. Fasih, D. A. Scollard, S. J. Done, D. C. Vines, D. E. Green, D. L. Costantini, and R. M. Reilly
18F-FDG Small-Animal PET/CT Differentiates Trastuzumab-Responsive from Unresponsive Human Breast Cancer Xenografts in Athymic Mice
J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2009; 50(11): 1848 - 1856.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
J. H. Lee, E. L. Rosen, and D. A. Mankoff
The Role of Radiotracer Imaging in the Diagnosis and Management of Patients with Breast Cancer: Part 2--Response to Therapy, Other Indications, and Future Directions
J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2009; 50(5): 738 - 748.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
N. Avril, S. Sassen, and R. Roylance
Response to Therapy in Breast Cancer
J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2009; 50(Suppl_1): 55S - 63S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
M. A. Lodge, H. A. Jacene, R. Pili, and R. L. Wahl
Reproducibility of Tumor Blood Flow Quantification with 15O-Water PET
J. Nucl. Med., October 1, 2008; 49(10): 1620 - 1627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
L. K. Dunnwald, J. R. Gralow, G. K. Ellis, R. B. Livingston, H. M. Linden, J. M. Specht, R. K. Doot, T. J. Lawton, W. E. Barlow, B. F. Kurland, et al.
Tumor Metabolism and Blood Flow Changes by Positron Emission Tomography: Relation to Survival in Patients Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., September 20, 2008; 26(27): 4449 - 4457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. Hattangadi, C. Park, J. Rembert, C. Klifa, J. Hwang, J. Gibbs, and N. Hylton
Breast Stromal Enhancement on MRI Is Associated with Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2008; 190(6): 1630 - 1636.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
L. M. Peterson, D. A. Mankoff, T. Lawton, K. Yagle, E. K. Schubert, S. Stekhova, A. Gown, J. M. Link, T. Tewson, and K. A. Krohn
Quantitative Imaging of Estrogen Receptor Expression in Breast Cancer with PET and 18F-Fluoroestradiol
J. Nucl. Med., March 1, 2008; 49(3): 367 - 374.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. J. A. Margolis, J. M. Hoffman, R. J. Herfkens, R. B. Jeffrey, A. Quon, and S. S. Gambhir
Molecular Imaging Techniques in Body Imaging
Radiology, November 1, 2007; 245(2): 333 - 356.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
E. L. Rosen, W. B. Eubank, and D. A. Mankoff
FDG PET, PET/CT, and Breast Cancer Imaging
RadioGraphics, October 1, 2007; 27(suppl_1): S215 - S229.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
D. A. Mankoff, J. F. Eary, J. M. Link, M. Muzi, J. G. Rajendran, A. M. Spence, and K. A. Krohn
Tumor-Specific Positron Emission Tomography Imaging in Patients: [18F] Fluorodeoxyglucose and Beyond
Clin. Cancer Res., June 15, 2007; 13(12): 3460 - 3469.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
M. Soret, S. L. Bacharach, and I. Buvat
Partial-Volume Effect in PET Tumor Imaging
J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2007; 48(6): 932 - 945.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
R. K. Doot, L. K. Dunnwald, E. K. Schubert, M. Muzi, L. M. Peterson, P. E. Kinahan, B. F. Kurland, and D. A. Mankoff
Dynamic and Static Approaches to Quantifying 18F-FDG Uptake for Measuring Cancer Response to Therapy, Including the Effect of Granulocyte CSF
J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2007; 48(6): 920 - 925.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. Cerussi, D. Hsiang, N. Shah, R. Mehta, A. Durkin, J. Butler, and B. J. Tromberg
Predicting response to breast cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy using diffuse optical spectroscopy
PNAS, March 6, 2007; 104(10): 4014 - 4019.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
C. Rousseau, A. Devillers, C. Sagan, L. Ferrer, B. Bridji, L. Campion, M. Ricaud, E. Bourbouloux, I. Doutriaux, M. Clouet, et al.
Monitoring of Early Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Stage II and III Breast Cancer by [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography
J. Clin. Oncol., December 1, 2006; 24(34): 5366 - 5372.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
W. A. Weber
Positron Emission Tomography As an Imaging Biomarker
J. Clin. Oncol., July 10, 2006; 24(20): 3282 - 3292.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
K. D. Miller, M. Miller, S. Mehrotra, B. Agarwal, B. H. Mock, Q.-H. Zheng, S. Badve, G. D. Hutchins, and G. W. Sledge Jr.
A Physiologic Imaging Pilot Study of Breast Cancer Treated with AZD2171
Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 2006; 12(1): 281 - 288.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
W A Weber
PET for response assessment in oncology: radiotherapy and chemotherapy
Br. J. Radiol., November 1, 2005; Supplement_28(1): 42 - 49.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
M. A. Roubidoux, G. L. LeCarpentier, J. B. Fowlkes, B. Bartz, D. Pai, S. P. Gordon, A. F. Schott, T. D. Johnson, and P. L. Carson
Sonographic Evaluation of Early-Stage Breast Cancers That Undergo Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
J. Ultrasound Med., July 1, 2005; 24(7): 885 - 895.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
J. Dose Schwarz, M. Bader, L. Jenicke, G. Hemminger, F. Janicke, and N. Avril
Early Prediction of Response to Chemotherapy in Metastatic Breast Cancer Using Sequential 18F-FDG PET
J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2005; 46(7): 1144 - 1150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
J. C. Miller, H. H. Pien, D. Sahani, A. G. Sorensen, and J. H. Thrall
Imaging Angiogenesis: Applications and Potential for Drug Development
J Natl Cancer Inst, February 2, 2005; 97(3): 172 - 187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
J. Tseng, L. K. Dunnwald, E. K. Schubert, J. M. Link, S. Minoshima, M. Muzi, and D. A. Mankoff
18F-FDG Kinetics in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer: Correlation with Tumor Blood Flow and Changes in Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2004; 45(11): 1829 - 1837.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
H. J. Biersack and H. Palmedo
Locally Advanced Breast Cancer: Is PET Useful for Monitoring Primary Chemotherapy?
J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2003; 44(11): 1815 - 1817.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2003 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.