| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Clinical Investigations |
, MD2
1 PET Centre, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
2 Department of Surgery, Thomayer’s Teaching Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
The preoperative staging of colorectal cancer (CRC) with 18F-FDG PET is not as yet generally considered to be evidence based. We have found only 1 study that evaluated 18F-FDG PET in a nonselected population with proven CRC. Several other studies have concentrated on more advanced disease. The aim of this study was to assess the potential clinical benefit of 18F-FDG PET in the routine staging of CRC. Methods: Thirty-eight consecutive patients who had had CRC histologically proven by colonoscopy underwent prospective preoperative staging by plain chest radiography, sonography, CT, and 18F-FDG PET. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were retrospectively assessed by comparison with the histologic results after surgery (36 patients) or clinical follow-up (2 inoperable cases—both patients died within 1 y of the PET examination). The impact of 18F-FDG PET on therapeutic decision making was evaluated by comparing medical records before and after 18F-FDG PET. Results: 18F-FDG PET correctly detected 95% of primary tumors, whereas CT and sonography correctly detected only 49% and 14%, respectively. Lymph nodes were involved in 7 patients. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 18F-FDG PET were 29%, 88%, and 75%, respectively. CT and sonography did not reveal any lymph node involvement. Liver metastases were present in 9 patients. 18F-FDG PET, CT, and sonography had a sensitivity of 78%, 67%, and 25%, respectively; a specificity of 96%, 100%, and 100%, respectively; and an accuracy of 91%, 91%, and 81%, respectively. 18F-FDG PET revealed further lesions in 11 patients. Levels of carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 tumor markers were elevated in, respectively, only 33% and 8% of cases of proven CRC. 18F-FDG PET changed the treatment modality for 8% and the range of surgery for 13% of patients. In total, 18F-FDG PET changed the method of treatment for 16% of patients. Conclusion: Plain chest radiography and sonography did not bring any clinical benefits. No correlation was found between the level of tumor markers and the stage of disease. CT is necessary for confirmation of PET findings at extraabdominal sites (PET-guided CT) and for their morphologic specification at abdominal and pelvic sites before an operation. 18F-FDG PET is the best method for the staging of CRC in all localities, despite the high rate of false-negative PET findings in patients with lymph node involvement. PET should be performed as a first examination after verification of CRC. We propose a PET/CT hybrid system as optimal in the staging of CRC.
Key Words: colorectal cancer • staging • 18F-FDG • PET
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  Y. Tsunoda, M. Ito, H. Fujii, H. Kuwano, and N. Saito Preoperative Diagnosis of Lymph Node Metastases of Colorectal Cancer by FDG-PET/CT Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., May 1, 2008; 38(5): 347 - 353. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Leibold, J. Shia, L. Ruo, B. D. Minsky, T. Akhurst, M. J. Gollub, M. S. Ginsberg, S. Larson, E. Riedel, W. D. Wong, et al. Prognostic Implications of the Distribution of Lymph Node Metastases in Rectal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy J. Clin. Oncol., May 1, 2008; 26(13): 2106 - 2111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. S. R. Nahas, T. Akhurst, H. Yeung, E. Riedel, A. J. Markowitz, B. D. Minsky, P. B. Paty, M. R. Weiser, L. K. Temple, W. D. Wong, et al. Positron Emission Tomography Detection of Distant Metastatic or Synchronous Disease in Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Receiving Preoperative Chemoradiation Ann. Surg. Oncol., March 1, 2008; 15(3): 704 - 711. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. A. Herbertson, S. T. Lee, N. Tebbutt, and A. M. Scott The expanding role of PET technology in the management of patients with colorectal cancer Ann. Onc., November 1, 2007; 18(11): 1774 - 1781. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. C. Riedl, T. Akhurst, S. Larson, S. F. Stanziale, S. Tuorto, A. Bhargava, H. Hricak, D. Klimstra, and Y. Fong 18F-FDG PET Scanning Correlates with Tissue Markers of Poor Prognosis and Predicts Mortality for Patients After Liver Resection for Colorectal Metastases J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2007; 48(5): 771 - 775. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. Gregoire, K. Haustermans, X. Geets, S. Roels, and M. Lonneux PET-Based Treatment Planning in Radiotherapy: A New Standard? J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2007; 48(1_suppl): 68S - 77S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. D. Berry and G. J. R. Cook Positron emission tomography in oncology Br. Med. Bull., December 14, 2006; (2006) ldl013v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Veit-Haibach, C. A. Kuehle, T. Beyer, H. Stergar, H. Kuehl, J. Schmidt, G. Borsch, G. Dahmen, J. Barkhausen, A. Bockisch, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Colorectal Cancer Staging With Whole-Body PET/CT Colonography JAMA, December 6, 2006; 296(21): 2590 - 2600. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Quon, S. Napel, C. F. Beaulieu, and S. S. Gambhir "Flying Through" and "Flying Around" a PET/CT Scan: Pilot Study and Development of 3D Integrated 18F-FDG PET/CT for Virtual Bronchoscopy and Colonoscopy J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2006; 47(7): 1081 - 1087. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H Furukawa, H Ikuma, A Seki, K Yokoe, S Yuen, T Aramaki, and S Yamagushi Positron emission tomography scanning is not superior to whole body multidetector helical computed tomography in the preoperative staging of colorectal cancer Gut, July 1, 2006; 55(7): 1007 - 1011. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. K. von Schulthess, H. C. Steinert, and T. F. Hany Integrated PET/CT: Current Applications and Future Directions Radiology, February 1, 2006; 238(2): 405 - 422. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. Kalff, C. Duong, E. G. Drummond, J. P. Matthews, and R. J. Hicks Findings on 18F-FDG PET Scans After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Provides Prognostic Stratification in Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Carcinoma Subsequently Treated by Radical Surgery J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2006; 47(1): 14 - 22. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P Veit, C Kuhle, T Beyer, H Kuehl, C U Herborn, G Borsch, H Stergar, J Barkhausen, A Bockisch, and G Antoch Whole body positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) tumour staging with integrated PET/CT colonography: technical feasibility and first experiences in patients with colorectal cancer Gut, January 1, 2006; 55(1): 68 - 73. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
U. Metser 18F-FDG PET in Evaluating Patients Treated for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Can We Predict Prognosis? J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2004; 45(9): 1428 - 1430. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY | THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE |
