HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Buscombe, J. R. Articles by Hilson, A. J.W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Buscombe, J. R. Articles by Hilson, A. J.W.

Long-Term Efficacy of High-Activity ¹¹¹In-Pentetreotide Therapy in Patients with Disseminated Neuroendocrine Tumors

The Neuroendocrine Tumor Clinic, Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom

High-activity ¹¹¹In-pentetreotide has been used to treat patients with disseminated neuroendocrine tumors. There is, however, little information related to the efficacy of this agent beyond the normal 6-mo assessment period. Before we can assume that such treatment would be beneficial to patients with neuroendocrine tumors the outcome of the patients over a longer time course should be determined. Methods: The case records of 16 patients who had received high activities of ¹¹¹In-pentetreotide (with cumulative activities as high as 36.6 GBq) over a 2.5-y period, from January 1, 1997, to June 30, 2000, were reviewed. There were 8 female and 8 male patients (age range, 32–76 y): 10 patients had carcinoid, 2 had medullary cell carcinoma of the thyroid, and 1 each had a gastrinoma, glucagonoma, fibrolamellar cancer, and malignant histiocytoma. The minimum number of treatments received was 1 in 2 patients (with activities of 3.1 and 7 GBq); the maximum was 10 treatments (total, 36.6 GBq). Treatment was given using an infusion pump and was repeated at 4- to 12-wk intervals (mean number of treatments per patient, 6). Response to therapy was determined by changes in the size of the tumor on CT using the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors. Toxicity was measured using blood and urine tests of renal, hepatic, thyroid, and bone marrow function. The mean and median time from the last treatment to progression of disease and death (if applicable) was also calculated. Results: No significant or long-lasting toxicity was encountered. At 6 mo after the patient’s last treatment, 5 patients (30%) had disease progression, 2 had complete responses, and 3 had partial responses. Twelve months after their last treatment, 9 patients (56%) had disease progression, and, at 18 mo, 11 patients (69%) had disease progression. The mean progression-free survival was 12.25 mo (median, 9 mo). For those who survived 6 mo after their last treatment, the mean survival was 15.75 mo (median, 16 mo). At the 6-mo assessment point, there had been 3 deaths (19%): 1 death was not related to cancer. At 12 mo, there was 1 additional cancer death. At 18 mo, there were 3 additional deaths (1 was not related to the patient’s carcinoid tumor but was due to a second coexistent cancer). By the end of the 18-mo assessment period, 7 patients (44%) had died. The mean time interval between disease progression and death was 5 mo. Conclusion: In patients treated with high-activity ¹¹¹In-pentreotide, 70% had some benefit for at least 6 mo after the end of treatment; however, 31% of patients will have sustained benefit at 18 mo from this treatment. This was obtained without significant toxicity.

Key Words: neuroendocrine • therapy • ¹¹¹In-pentetreotide • toxicity • efficacy

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. H Kulke Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors: a role for targeted therapies? Endocr. Relat. Cancer, June 1, 2007; 14(2): 207 - 219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G A Kaltsas, D Papadogias, P Makras, and A B Grossman Treatment of advanced neuroendocrine tumours with radiolabelled somatostatin analogues Endocr. Relat. Cancer, December 1, 2005; 12(4): 683 - 699. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Ginj, K. Hinni, S. Tschumi, S. Schulz, and H. R. Maecke Trifunctional Somatostatin-Based Derivatives Designed for Targeted Radiotherapy Using Auger Electron Emitters J. Nucl. Med., December 1, 2005; 46(12): 2097 - 2103. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. K. G. McStay, D. Maudgil, M. Williams, J. M. Tibballs, A. F. Watkinson, M. E. Caplin, and J. R. Buscombe Large-Volume Liver Metastases from Neuroendocrine Tumors: Hepatic Intraarterial 90Y-DOTA-Lanreotide as Effective Palliative Therapy Radiology, November 1, 2005; 237(2): 718 - 726. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J K Ramage, A H G Davies, J Ardill, N Bax, M Caplin, A Grossman, R Hawkins, A M McNicol, N Reed, R Sutton, et al. Guidelines for the management of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine (including carcinoid) tumours Gut, June 1, 2005; 54(suppl_4): iv1 - iv16. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Nguyen, M. Faraggi, A.-L. Giraudet, C. de Labriolle-Vaylet, T. Aparicio, F. Rouzet, M. Mignon, S. Askienazy, and I. Sobhani Long-Term Efficacy of Radionuclide Therapy in Patients with Disseminated Neuroendocrine Tumors Uncontrolled by Conventional Therapy J. Nucl. Med., October 1, 2004; 45(10): 1660 - 1668. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. A. Kaltsas, G. M. Besser, and A. B. Grossman The Diagnosis and Medical Management of Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors Endocr. Rev., June 1, 2004; 25(3): 458 - 511. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]