JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nakamoto, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Wahl, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nakamoto, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Wahl, R. L.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 43 No. 9 1137-1143
© 2002 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


Clinical Investigations

PET/CT: Comparison of Quantitative Tracer Uptake Between Germanium and CT Transmission Attenuation-Corrected Images

Yuji Nakamoto, MD, PhD1, Medhat Osman, MD, PhD1, Christian Cohade, MD1, Laura T. Marshall, BS1, Jonathan M. Links, PhD2, Steve Kohlmyer, MS3 and Richard L. Wahl, MD1

1 Division of Nuclear Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
2 Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
3 General Electric Medical Systems, Milwaukee, Wisconsin

In PET, transmission scanning for attenuation correction has most commonly been performed with an external positron-emitting radionuclide source, such as 68Ge. More recently, combined PET/CT scanners have been developed in which the CT data can be used for both anatometabolic image formation and attenuation correction of the PET data. The purpose of this study was to assess the quantitative differences between CT-based and germanium-based attenuation-corrected PET images. Methods: Twenty-eight patients with known or suspected cancer underwent whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT scanning for clinical diagnostic purposes. For each patient, attenuation maps were obtained from both the CT scan and the 68Ge transmission data, and 2 different attenuation-corrected emission datasets were produced. Measured activity concentrations (both mean and maximum) from identical regions of interest in representative normal organs and in 36 pathologic foci of uptake were compared. Results: CT-corrected emission images generally showed slightly higher radioactive concentration values than did germanium-corrected images (P < 0.01) for all lesions and all normal organs except the lung. Mean and maximum radioactivity concentrations were 4.3%–15.2% higher for CT-corrected images than for germanium-corrected images. Calculated radioactivity concentrations were significantly greater in osseous lesions than in nonosseous lesions (11.0% vs. 2.3%, P < 0.05, for mean value; 11.1% vs. 2.1%, P < 0.01, for maximum value). A weak positive correlation was observed between the CT Hounsfield units within the regions of interest and the percentage difference in apparent tracer activity in the CT-corrected images. Conclusion: Although quantitative radioactivity values are generally comparable between CT- and germanium-corrected emission PET images, CT-based attenuation correction produced radioactivity concentration values significantly higher than the germanium-based corrected values. These effects, especially in radiodense tissues, should be noted when using and comparing quantitative PET analyses from PET and PET/CT systems.

Key Words: 18F-FDG PET • CT • attenuation correction • PET/CT




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nucl. Med. Technol.Home page
S. Belakhlef, C. Church, A. Hays, R. Fraser, and S. Lakhanpal
Quantitative Assessment of the Influence of Location, Internal Temperature, Idle Time, and Normalization on the Sensitivity of a Mobile PET/CT Scanner
J. Nucl. Med. Technol., September 1, 2008; 36(3): 147 - 150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
C. Nahmias, C. Lemmens, D. Faul, E. Carlson, M. Long, T. Blodgett, J. Nuyts, and D. Townsend
Does Reducing CT Artifacts from Dental Implants Influence the PET Interpretation in PET/CT Studies of Oral Cancer and Head and Neck Cancer?
J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2008; 49(7): 1047 - 1052.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
D. W. Townsend
Dual-Modality Imaging: Combining Anatomy and Function
J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2008; 49(6): 938 - 955.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
N. Kosaka, T. Tsuchida, H. Uematsu, H. Kimura, H. Okazawa, and H. Itoh
18F-FDG PET of Common Enhancing Malignant Brain Tumors
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2008; 190(6): W365 - W369.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
A. M. Alessio, S. Kohlmyer, K. Branch, G. Chen, J. Caldwell, and P. Kinahan
Cine CT for Attenuation Correction in Cardiac PET/CT
J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2007; 48(5): 794 - 801.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
F. H. Fahey, M. R. Palmer, K. J. Strauss, R. E. Zimmerman, R. D. Badawi, and S. T. Treves
Dosimetry and Adequacy of CT-based Attenuation Correction for Pediatric PET: Phantom Study
Radiology, April 1, 2007; 243(1): 96 - 104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
M. A. Blake, A. Singh, B. N. Setty, J. Slattery, M. Kalra, M. M. Maher, D. V. Sahani, A. J. Fischman, and P. R. Mueller
Pearls and Pitfalls in Interpretation of Abdominal and Pelvic PET-CT
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2006; 26(5): 1335 - 1353.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
O. Mawlawi, J. J. Erasmus, T. Pan, D. D. Cody, R. Campbell, A. H. Lonn, S. Kohlmyer, H. A. Macapinlac, and D. A. Podoloff
Truncation Artifact on PET/CT: Impact on Measurements of Activity Concentration and Assessment of a Correction Algorithm.
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2006; 186(5): 1458 - 1467.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
Y. Hashimoto, T. Tsujikawa, C. Kondo, M. Maki, M. Momose, A. Nagai, T. Ohnuki, T. Nishikawa, and K. Kusakabe
Accuracy of PET for Diagnosis of Solid Pulmonary Lesions with 18F-FDG Uptake Below the Standardized Uptake Value of 2.5
J. Nucl. Med., March 1, 2006; 47(3): 426 - 431.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
T. Pan, O. Mawlawi, S. A. Nehmeh, Y. E. Erdi, D. Luo, H. H. Liu, R. Castillo, R. Mohan, Z. Liao, and H.A. Macapinlac
Attenuation Correction of PET Images with Respiration-Averaged CT Images in PET/CT
J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2005; 46(9): 1481 - 1487.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
H. Schoder, H. W.D. Yeung, and S. M. Larson
CT in PET/CT: Essential Features of Interpretation
J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2005; 46(8): 1249 - 1251.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. G. Yi, E. M. Marom, R. F. Munden, M. T. Truong, H. A. Macapinlac, G. W. Gladish, B. S. Sabloff, and D. A. Podoloff
Focal Uptake of Fluorodeoxyglucose by the Thyroid in Patients Undergoing Initial Disease Staging with Combined PET/CT for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Radiology, July 1, 2005; 236(1): 271 - 275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
G. Brix, U. Lechel, G. Glatting, S. I. Ziegler, W. Munzing, S. P. Muller, and T. Beyer
Radiation Exposure of Patients Undergoing Whole-Body Dual-Modality 18F-FDG PET/CT Examinations
J. Nucl. Med., April 1, 2005; 46(4): 608 - 613.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
Y. Nakamoto, M. Tatsumi, D. Hammoud, C. Cohade, M. M. Osman, and R. L. Wahl
Normal FDG Distribution Patterns in the Head and Neck: PET/CT Evaluation
Radiology, March 1, 2005; 234(3): 879 - 885.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
Y.-Y. Yau, W.-S. Chan, Y.-M. Tam, P. Vernon, S. Wong, M. Coel, and S. K.-F. Chu
Application of Intravenous Contrast in PET/CT: Does It Really Introduce Significant Attenuation Correction Error?
J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2005; 46(2): 283 - 291.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
R. L. Wahl
Why Nearly All PET of Abdominal and Pelvic Cancers Will Be Performed as PET/CT
J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2004; 45(90010): 82S - 95.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
S. A. Nehmeh, Y. E. Erdi, H. Kalaigian, K. S. Kolbert, T. Pan, H. Yeung, O. Squire, A. Sinha, S. M. Larson, and J. L. Humm
Correction for Oral Contrast Artifacts in CT Attenuation-Corrected PET Images Obtained by Combined PET/CT
J. Nucl. Med., December 1, 2003; 44(12): 1940 - 1944.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Tatsumi, C. Cohade, Y. Nakamoto, and R. L. Wahl
Fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake in the Aortic Wall at PET/CT: Possible Finding for Active Atherosclerosis
Radiology, December 1, 2003; 229(3): 831 - 837.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
Y. Nakamoto, B. B. Chin, D. L. Kraitchman, L. P. Lawler, L. T. Marshall, and R. L. Wahl
Effects of Nonionic Intravenous Contrast Agents at PET/CT Imaging: Phantom and Canine Studies
Radiology, June 1, 2003; 227(3): 817 - 824.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
E. Dizendorf, T. F. Hany, A. Buck, G. K. von Schulthess, and C. Burger
Cause and Magnitude of the Error Induced by Oral CT Contrast Agent in CT-Based Attenuation Correction of PET Emission Studies
J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2003; 44(5): 732 - 738.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
C. Cohade, M. Osman, Y. Nakamoto, L. T. Marshall, J. M. Links, E. K. Fishman, and R. L. Wahl
Initial Experience with Oral Contrast in PET/CT: Phantom and Clinical Studies
J. Nucl. Med., March 1, 2003; 44(3): 412 - 416.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2002 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.