|
|
||||||||
Clinical Investigations |
1 Nuclear Medicine Department, Hôpital Bichat, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
2 Nuclear Medicine Department, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France
3 Nuclear Medicine Department, Hôpital Universitaire Neuro-Cardiologique, Lyon, France
4 Gastroenterology Department, Hôpital Bichat, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of a new somatostatin analog, 99mTc-P829, compared with that of 111In-pentetreotide. Methods: Forty-three patients (32 men, 11 women; age range, 2478 y; mean age, 56 y) with biologically or histologically proven neuroendocrine tumors were prospectively included: 11 patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, 16 patients with carcinoid tumors, and 16 patients with other types of functioning (n = 6) or nonfunctioning (n = 10) endocrine tumors. 111In-Pentetreotide planar images (head, chest, abdomen, and pelvis) were obtained 4 and 24 h after injection of 10 µg somatostatin analog labeled with 148 ± 17 MBq 111In, and SPECT was performed 24 h after injection. Similar 99mTc-P829 planar images were obtained at 1, 46, and 24 h after injection of 50 µg peptide labeled with 991.6 ± 187.59 MBq 99mTc. Abdominal SPECT was performed 46 h after injection. Results: 111In-Pentetreotide detected 203 tumoral sites in 39 (91%) of 43 patients, whereas 99mTc-P829 detected 77 sites in 28 (65%) of 43 patients (P < 0.005). In the liver, 129 sites (in 24 patients) were detected by 111In-pentetreotide scintigraphy and 34 sites (in 10 patients) were detected by 99mTc-P829 scintigraphy. Conclusion: In patients with endocrine tumors, the detection rate of 99mTc-P829 scintigraphy was lower than that of 111In-pentetreotide scintigraphy, which appeared to be more sensitive, especially for liver metastases.
Key Words: somatostatin receptor scintigraphy 99mTc-P829 scintigraphy endocrine tumors
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Rodrigues, S. Li, M. Gabriel, D. Heute, M. Greifeneder, and I. Virgolini 99mTc-Depreotide Scintigraphy Versus 18F-FDG-PET in the Diagnosis of Radioiodine-Negative Thyroid Cancer J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2006; 91(10): 3997 - 4000. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Storch, M. Behe, M. A. Walter, J. Chen, P. Powell, R. Mikolajczak, and H. R. Macke Evaluation of [99mTc/EDDA/HYNIC0]Octreotide Derivatives Compared with [111In-DOTA0,Tyr3, Thr8]Octreotide and [111In-DTPA0]Octreotide: Does Tumor or Pancreas Uptake Correlate with the Rate of Internalization? J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2005; 46(9): 1561 - 1569. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ginj, J. Chen, M. A. Walter, V. Eltschinger, J. C. Reubi, and H. R. Maecke Preclinical Evaluation of New and Highly Potent Analogues of Octreotide for Predictive Imaging and Targeted Radiotherapy Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2005; 11(3): 1136 - 1145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Van Den Bossche and C. Van de Wiele Receptor Imaging in Oncology by Means of Nuclear Medicine: Current Status J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2004; 22(17): 3593 - 3607. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Reubi Peptide Receptors as Molecular Targets for Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy Endocr. Rev., August 1, 2003; 24(4): 389 - 427. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Gabriel, C. Decristoforo, E. Donnemiller, H. Ulmer, C. Watfah Rychlinski, S. J. Mather, and R. Moncayo An Intrapatient Comparison of 99mTc-EDDA/HYNIC-TOC with 111In-DTPA-Octreotide for Diagnosis of Somatostatin Receptor-Expressing Tumors J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2003; 44(5): 708 - 716. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY | THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE |