|
|
||||||||
Clinical Investigations |
1 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Regina Elena Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
2 Second Department of Medical Oncology, Regina Elena Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
3 First Department of Surgical Oncology, Regina Elena Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
4 Department of Pathology, Regina Elena Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
This study evaluated the role of 99mTc-sestamibi washout in the prediction of pathologic tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in 30 patients with locally advanced breast cancer. Methods: Two 99mTc-sestamibi studies were performed before and after chemotherapy for each patient. Early (10 min) and delayed (240 min) planar breast views were acquired after a 740-MBq 99mTc-sestamibi intravenous injection, and the washout rate (WOR) was computed. All patients underwent radical mastectomy with pathologic evaluation of the residual tumor size. Results: The pretherapy 99mTc-sestamibi WOR ranged from 14% to 92% (mean ± SD, 50% ± 18%). At pathologic examination, 15 patients showed no tumor response to chemotherapy and 15 patients showed an objective response to chemotherapy. The pretherapy 99mTc-sestamibi study predicted chemoresistance (WOR > 45%) in 18 of 30 patients and no chemoresistance (WOR
45%) in 12 of 30 patients. When the WOR cutoff was set at >45%, the prognostic performance of the test was indicated by a sensitivity of 100%; a specificity of 80%; positive and negative predictive values of 83% and 100%, respectively; and a likelihood ratio of 5. The repeatability of the test was good, with 80%93% interreader agreement (
= 0.57-0.85). Posttherapy 99mTc-sestamibi studies confirmed the pretherapy study prediction in 29 of 30 patients. Conclusion: 99mTc-Sestamibi WOR is a reliable test for predicting tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In fact, negative findings (WOR
45%) rule out chemoresistance and positive findings (WOR > 45%) indicate a high risk of chemoresistance.
Key Words: 99mTc-sestamibi multidrug resistance neoadjuvant chemotherapy breast cancer
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. W. Park, R. S. Kerbel, G. J. Kelloff, J. C. Barrett, B. A. Chabner, D. R. Parkinson, J. Peck, R. W. Ruddon, C. C. Sigman, and D. J. Slamon Rationale for Biomarkers and Surrogate End Points in Mechanism-Driven Oncology Drug Development Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2004; 10(11): 3885 - 3896. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY | THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE |