JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kalff, V.
Right arrow Articles by McKenzie, A. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kalff, V.
Right arrow Articles by McKenzie, A. F.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 43 No. 4 492-499
© 2002 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


Clinical Investigations

The Clinical Impact of 18F-FDG PET in Patients with Suspected or Confirmed Recurrence of Colorectal Cancer: A Prospective Study

Victor Kalff, MB, BS;1, Rodney J. Hicks, MD;1, Robert E. Ware, MB, BS;1, Annette Hogg, PhD;1, David Binns, Dip App Sci;1 and Allan F. McKenzie, MB, BS1

1 Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, East Melbourne, Australia

This prospective study aimed to confirm, in a clinical setting, the benefits suggested by earlier retrospective studies of 18F-FDG PET scanning for the evaluation of patients with suspected recurrence of colorectal cancer. Methods: The referring oncologist was asked to prospectively assign a treatment plan for 102 consecutive patients being evaluated by 18F-FDG PET for suspected or confirmed recurrence of colorectal cancer and without evidence of unresectable disease on conventional staging investigations, including CT. This treatment plan was then compared with that based on incremental information supplied by PET. Management changes were validated by follow-up. Results: For 6 patients, the oncologist would not commit to a management plan without access to PET information, and for all these patients, PET correctly guided management. Of the remaining 96 patients, the management plan for 54 (56%) was altered as a direct result of unexpected PET findings. Thus, PET directly influenced management in 60 (59%) of 102 patients. The discrepant PET results could be validated in 57 patients and were correct for both the presence and the extent of malignant disease in 52 (91%) of these patients but were false-positive in 1 patient because of a pelvic abscess and underestimated the extent of metastatic disease in 4 (7%). Relapse was confirmed in 49 (98%) of 50 evaluable patients with positive PET findings. Significantly, planned surgery was abandoned in 26 (60%) of 43 patients because of incremental PET findings. Of the 42 patients for whom management was not changed by PET findings, false-negative PET findings were documented for 5 (4 with metastases < 1 cm), and the PET findings for 1 were presumed to be false-positive because of sarcoidosis. Conclusion: This prospective study confirms the high impact, suggested by previous retrospective analyses, of 18F-FDG PET on management of patients with suspected recurrent colorectal cancer. The major benefit of PET is avoidance of inappropriate local therapies by documentation of widespread disease.

Key Words: 18F-FDG • recurrent colorectal cancer • PET • prospective study




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
B. E. Hillner, B. A. Siegel, D. Liu, A. F. Shields, I. F. Gareen, L. Hanna, S. H. Stine, and R. E. Coleman
Impact of Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Alone on Expected Management of Patients With Cancer: Initial Results From the National Oncologic PET Registry
J. Clin. Oncol., May 1, 2008; 26(13): 2155 - 2161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. J. A. Margolis, J. M. Hoffman, R. J. Herfkens, R. B. Jeffrey, A. Quon, and S. S. Gambhir
Molecular Imaging Techniques in Body Imaging
Radiology, November 1, 2007; 245(2): 333 - 356.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
N Aide, M Benayoun, K Kerrou, A Khalil, J Cadranel, and J N Talbot
Impact of [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]-FDG) imaging in sarcoidosis: unsuspected neurosarcoidosis discovered by [18F]-FDG PET and early metabolic response to corticosteroid therapy
Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2007; 80(951): e67 - e71.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
Y. Nakamoto, S. Sakamoto, T. Okada, M. Senda, T. Higashi, T. Saga, and K. Togashi
Clinical Value of Manual Fusion of PET and CT Images in Patients with Suspected Recurrent Colorectal Cancer
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2007; 188(1): 257 - 267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
O. Israel and A. Kuten
Early Detection of Cancer Recurrence: 18F-FDG PET/CT Can Make a Difference in Diagnosis and Patient Care
J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2007; 48(1_suppl): 28S - 35S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
P. Veit-Haibach, C. A. Kuehle, T. Beyer, H. Stergar, H. Kuehl, J. Schmidt, G. Borsch, G. Dahmen, J. Barkhausen, A. Bockisch, et al.
Diagnostic Accuracy of Colorectal Cancer Staging With Whole-Body PET/CT Colonography
JAMA, December 6, 2006; 296(21): 2590 - 2600.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
A. Quon, S. Napel, C. F. Beaulieu, and S. S. Gambhir
"Flying Through" and "Flying Around" a PET/CT Scan: Pilot Study and Development of 3D Integrated 18F-FDG PET/CT for Virtual Bronchoscopy and Colonoscopy
J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2006; 47(7): 1081 - 1087.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
V. Kalff, C. Duong, E. G. Drummond, J. P. Matthews, and R. J. Hicks
Findings on 18F-FDG PET Scans After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Provides Prognostic Stratification in Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Carcinoma Subsequently Treated by Radical Surgery
J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2006; 47(1): 14 - 22.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
P Veit, C Kuhle, T Beyer, H Kuehl, C U Herborn, G Borsch, H Stergar, J Barkhausen, A Bockisch, and G Antoch
Whole body positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) tumour staging with integrated PET/CT colonography: technical feasibility and first experiences in patients with colorectal cancer
Gut, January 1, 2006; 55(1): 68 - 73.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
H. Fukunaga, M. Sekimoto, M. Ikeda, I. Higuchi, M. Yasui, I. Seshimo, O. Takayama, H. Yamamoto, M. Ohue, M. Tatsumi, et al.
Fusion Image of Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography for the Diagnosis of Local Recurrence of Rectal Cancer
Ann. Surg. Oncol., July 1, 2005; 12(7): 561 - 569.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
E. E. Pakos, A. D. Fotopoulos, and J. P.A. Ioannidis
18F-FDG PET for Evaluation of Bone Marrow Infiltration in Staging of Lymphoma: A Meta-Analysis
J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2005; 46(6): 958 - 963.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. Yao, G. F. Funk, D. P. Goldstein, B. R. DeYoung, and M. M. Graham
Benign Lesions in Cancer Patients: CASE 1. Sarcoidosis After Chemoradiation for Head and Neck Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., January 20, 2005; 23(3): 640 - 641.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
O. Israel, M. Mor, L. Guralnik, N. Hermoni, D. Gaitini, R. Bar-Shalom, Z. Keidar, and R. Epelbaum
Is 18F-FDG PET/CT Useful for Imaging and Management of Patients with Suspected Occult Recurrence of Cancer?
J. Nucl. Med., December 1, 2004; 45(12): 2045 - 2051.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
U. Metser
18F-FDG PET in Evaluating Patients Treated for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Can We Predict Prognosis?
J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2004; 45(9): 1428 - 1430.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. Even-Sapir, Y. Parag, H. Lerman, M. Gutman, C. Levine, M. Rabau, A. Figer, and U. Metser
Detection of Recurrence in Patients with Rectal Cancer: PET/CT after Abdominoperineal or Anterior Resection
Radiology, September 1, 2004; 232(3): 815 - 822.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
W. B. Eubank, D. Mankoff, M. Bhattacharya, J. Gralow, H. Linden, G. Ellis, S. Lindsley, M. Austin-Seymour, and R. Livingston
Impact of FDG PET on Defining the Extent of Disease and on the Treatment of Patients with Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2004; 183(2): 479 - 486.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. Agress Jr and B. Z. Cooper
Detection of Clinically Unexpected Malignant and Premalignant Tumors with Whole-Body FDG PET: Histopathologic Comparison
Radiology, February 1, 2004; 230(2): 417 - 422.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
K. Knesaurek, J. Machac, B. R. Krynyckyi, and O. D. Almeida
Comparison of 2-Dimensional and 3-Dimensional 82Rb Myocardial Perfusion PET Imaging
J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2003; 44(8): 1350 - 1356.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
T. Torizuka, T. Kanno, M. Futatsubashi, H. Okada, E. Yoshikawa, F. Nakamura, M. Takekuma, M. Maeda, and Y. Ouchi
Imaging of Gynecologic Tumors: Comparison of 11C-Choline PET with 18F-FDG PET
J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2003; 44(7): 1051 - 1056.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
B B Chin and R L Wahl
18F-Fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the evaluation of gastrointestinal malignancies
Gut, June 1, 2003; 52(90004): iv23 - 29.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch GastroenterologyHome page
Utility of PET Scanning for Evaluation of Recurrent Colorectal Cancer
Journal Watch Gastroenterology, August 13, 2002; 2002(813): 7 - 7.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2002 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.