JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van Laere, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by Dierckx, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Van Laere, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by Dierckx, R.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 43 No. 4 458-469
© 2002 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


Clinical Investigations

Analysis of Clinical Brain SPECT Data Based on Anatomic Standardization and Reference to Normal Data: An ROC-Based Comparison of Visual, Semiquantitative, and Voxel-Based Methods

Koenraad J. Van Laere, MD, PhD, DrSc;1, James Warwick, MD;2, Jan Versijpt, MD;1, Ingeborg Goethals, MD;1, Kurt Audenaert, MD, PhD;3, Ben Van Heerden, MD, MSc;2 and Rudi Dierckx, MD, PhD1

1 Division of Nuclear Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
2 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Tygerberg Hospital, University of Stellenbosch, Matieland, South Africa
3 Department of Psychiatry, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium

The technique of anatomic standardization and comparison with normal templates is increasingly used in clinical brain SPECT practice and allows automated, operator-independent volume-of-interest (VOI) or voxel-based analysis of whole-brain data. In 2 distinct clinical populations with severe traumatic brain injury and cognitive impairment, this study compared 3 widely available approaches that use normal templates to evaluate SPECT brain perfusion deficits. Methods: In total, 74 subjects were studied. These included 14 patients with severe, traumatic brain injury (group 1; 10 males, 4 females; mean age ± SD, 27.6 ± 8.2 y) and 15 patients with cognitive impairment (group 2; 7 males, 8 females; mean age, 75.8 ± 8.6 y). These data were compared with those from, respectively, 25 and 20 age- and sex-adjusted healthy volunteers. All data were analyzed in 4 ways. Three semiquantitative statistical algorithms were used: statistical parametric mapping (SPM) using SPM99, brain registration and analysis of SPECT studies (BRASS) using a voxelwise region-growing technique, and a predefined VOI approach. These results were compared with visual analysis based on consensus reading by 3 experienced nuclear medicine physicians. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed at various statistical cutoffs. Moreover, as a measure of regional agreement, relative regional agreement between methods was assessed. Results: In both study groups, BRASS voxel-based analysis was most accurate, as defined by the area under the ROC curve (0.97 for group 1 and 0.96 for group 2). VOI assessment was slightly more accurate than visual consensus analysis, whereas SPM showed, overall, a lower area under the ROC curve. SPM analysis was also significantly less sensitive at thresholds corresponding to low false-positive fractions. Regional analysis showed 83%–92% agreement between all methods. Conclusion: Under clinical conditions, classification of brain SPECT studies can greatly be aided by anatomic standardization techniques and reference to normal data. Under the investigated circumstances, SPM was found to have a lower sensitivity than VOI or voxelwise region-growing techniques, especially at low false-positive fractions.

Key Words: SPECT • statistical parametric mapping • traumatic brain injury • cognitive impairment • anatomic standardization




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
C. Casteels, P. Vermaelen, J. Nuyts, A. Van Der Linden, V. Baekelandt, L. Mortelmans, G. Bormans, and K. Van Laere
Construction and Evaluation of Multitracer Small-Animal PET Probabilistic Atlases for Voxel-Based Functional Mapping of the Rat Brain
J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2006; 47(11): 1858 - 1866.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
J. Spiegel, D. Hellwig, M.-O. Mollers, S. Behnke, W. Jost, K. Fassbender, S. Samnick, U. Dillmann, G. Becker, and C.-M. Kirsch
Transcranial sonography and [123I]FP-CIT SPECT disclose complementary aspects of Parkinson's disease
Brain, May 1, 2006; 129(5): 1188 - 1193.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
W. Koch, C. Hamann, J. Welsch, G. Popperl, P. E. Radau, and K. Tatsch
Is Iterative Reconstruction an Alternative to Filtered Backprojection in Routine Processing of Dopamine Transporter SPECT Studies?
J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2005; 46(11): 1804 - 1811.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
W. Koch, P. E. Radau, C. Hamann, and K. Tatsch
Clinical Testing of an Optimized Software Solution for an Automated, Observer-Independent Evaluation of Dopamine Transporter SPECT Studies
J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2005; 46(7): 1109 - 1118.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
G B Frisoni, P h Scheltens, S Galluzzi, F M Nobili, N C Fox, P H Robert, H Soininen, L-O Wahlund, G Waldemar, and E Salmon
Neuroimaging tools to rate regional atrophy, subcortical cerebrovascular disease, and regional cerebral blood flow and metabolism: consensus paper of the EADC
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, October 1, 2003; 74(10): 1371 - 1381.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2002 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.