JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pieterman, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Groen, H. J.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pieterman, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Groen, H. J.M.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 43 No. 2 167-172
© 2002 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


Clinical Investigations

Comparison of 11C-Choline and 18F-FDG PET in Primary Diagnosis and Staging of Patients with Thoracic Cancer

Remge M. Pieterman, MD1,2, Tjin H. Que, MD1, Philip H. Elsinga, PhD1, Jan Pruim, MD1, John W.G. van Putten, MD2, Antoon T.M. Willemsen, PhD1, Willem Vaalburg, PhD1 and Harry J.M. Groen, MD2

1 PET Center, Groningen University Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands
2 Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Groningen University Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands

PET with 18F-FDG is used for detection and staging of thoracic cancer; however, more specific PET radiopharmaceuticals would be welcome. 11C-labeled choline (CHOL) is a new radiopharmaceutical potentially useful for tumor imaging, since it is incorporated into cell membranes as phosphatidylcholine. The aim of this study was to investigate whether 11C-CHOL PET has advantages over 18F-FDG PET in patients with thoracic cancer. Methods: We evaluated 17 patients with thoracic cancer both with 11C-CHOL PET and 18F-FDG PET. After transmission scanning, 11C-CHOL was injected intravenously, and whole-body scanning was started after 5 min. Immediately thereafter, 18F-FDG was injected intravenously, followed after 90 min by interleaved attenuation-corrected whole-body scanning. Scans were performed from crown to femur. Visual and quantitative (standardized uptake value) analyses of 11C-CHOL PET and 18F-FDG PET were performed and compared with results of traditional staging and follow-up. Results: The most prominent features of normal 11C-CHOL distribution were high uptake in liver, renal cortex, and salivary glands. Except for some uptake in choroid plexus and pituitary gland, brain uptake was negligible. All primary thoracic tumors were detected with 11C-CHOL PET and 18F-FDG PET. Both 11C-CHOL PET and 18F-FDG PET correctly identified all 16 patients with lymph node involvement. However, in a lesion-to-lesion analysis, 11C-CHOL PET detected only 29 of 43 metastatic lymph nodes, whereas 18F-FDG PET detected 41 of 43. 11C-CHOL PET detected fewer intrapulmonary and pleural metastases than 18F-FDG PET (27/47 vs. 46/47). More brain metastases were detected with 11C-CHOL PET (23/23) than with 18F-FDG PET (3/23). For primary tumors, the median (range) standard uptake values of 11C-CHOL and 18F-FDG were 1.68 (0.98–3.22) and 4.22 (1.40–8.26), respectively (P = 0.001). Conclusion: 11C-CHOL PET can be used to visualize thoracic cancers. Although detection of lymph node metastases with 11C-CHOL PET was inferior compared with 18F-FDG PET, the detection of brain metastases was superior.

Key Words: 11C-choline • 18F-FDG • PET • thoracic cancer • metastasis




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. A. M. Heesakkers, J. J. Futterer, A. M. Hovels, H. C. M. van den Bosch, T. W. J. Scheenen, Y. L. Hoogeveen, and J. O. Barentsz
Prostate Cancer Evaluated with Ferumoxtran-10-enhanced T2*-weighted MR Imaging at 1.5 and 3.0 T: Early Experience.
Radiology, May 1, 2006; 239(2): 481 - 487.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
A. K. Buck, G. Glatting, and S. N. Reske
Quantification of 18F-FDG Uptake in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Feasible Prognostic Marker?
J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2004; 45(8): 1274 - 1276.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
J. Guo, K. Higashi, H. Yokota, Y. Nagao, Y. Ueda, Y. Kodama, M. Oguchi, S. Taki, H. Tonami, and I. Yamamoto
In Vitro Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopic Lactate and Choline Measurements, 18F-FDG Uptake, and Prognosis in Patients with Lung Adenocarcinoma
J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2004; 45(8): 1334 - 1339.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
M. K. Gould, W. G. Kuschner, C. E. Rydzak, C. C. Maclean, A. N. Demas, H. Shigemitsu, J. K. Chan, and D. K. Owens
Test Performance of Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography for Mediastinal Staging in Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
Ann Intern Med, December 2, 2003; 139(11): 879 - 892.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
T. Hara, N. Kosaka, T. Suzuki, K. Kudo, and H. Niino
Uptake Rates of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose and 11C-Choline in Lung Cancer and Pulmonary Tuberculosis: A Positron Emission Tomography Study
Chest, September 1, 2003; 124(3): 893 - 901.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
T. Torizuka, T. Kanno, M. Futatsubashi, H. Okada, E. Yoshikawa, F. Nakamura, M. Takekuma, M. Maeda, and Y. Ouchi
Imaging of Gynecologic Tumors: Comparison of 11C-Choline PET with 18F-FDG PET
J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2003; 44(7): 1051 - 1056.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2002 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.