JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A correction has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tralins, K. S.
Right arrow Articles by Spence, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tralins, K. S.
Right arrow Articles by Spence, A. M.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 43 No. 12 1667-1673
© 2002 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


Basic Science Investigations

Volumetric Analysis of 18F-FDG PET in Glioblastoma Multiforme: Prognostic Information and Possible Role in Definition of Target Volumes in Radiation Dose Escalation

Kevin S. Tralins, MD1, James G. Douglas, MD, MS1, Keith J. Stelzer, MD, PhD1, David A. Mankoff, MD2, Daniel L. Silbergeld, MD3, Robert Rostomilly, MD3, Sharon Hummel, MS1, Jeff Scharnhorst, BS4, Kenneth A. Krohn, PhD2 and Alexander M. Spence, MD4

1 Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
2 Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
3 Department of Neurosurgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
4 Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington

The use of 18F-FDG PET for brain tumors has been shown to be accurate in identifying areas of active disease. Radiation dose escalation in the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) may lead to improved disease control. On the basis of these premises, we initiated a pilot study to investigate the use of 18F-FDG PET for the guidance of radiation dose escalation in the treatment of GBM. Methods: Patients were considered eligible to participate in the study if they had a diagnosis of GBM, were at least 18 y old, and had a score of at least 60 on the Karnofsky Scale. Patients were treated with standard conformal fractionated radiotherapy (1.8 Gy per fraction, to 59.4 Gy), with volumes defined by MRI. At a dose of 45–50.4 Gy, patients underwent 18F-FDG PET for boost target delineation. Final noncoplanar fields (3–4) were designed to treat the volume of abnormal 18F-FDG uptake plus a 0.5-cm margin for an additional 20 Gy (2 Gy per fraction), to a total dose of 79.4 Gy. If no abnormal 18F-FDG uptake was observed, treatment was stopped after the conventional course of 59.4 Gy. Age, Karnofsky score, MRI-based volumes, and 18F-FDG PET volume were analyzed as prognostic variables for time to tumor progression (TTP) and overall survival. 18F-FDG PET volumes and MRI-based volumes were compared to assess concordance. Results: For the 27 patients who could be evaluated, median actuarial TTP was 43 wk, and median actuarial survival was 70 wk. On univariate analysis, 18F-FDG PET, T1-weighted MRI gadolinium enhancement (excluding nonenhancing resection cavity), and T2-weighted MRI volumes were significantly predictive of TTP. On multivariate analysis, only 18F-FDG PET volume retained significance for predicting TTP. Similar results were obtained on analysis of these variables as prognostic factors for survival. When 18F-FDG PET-based volumes were compared with MRI-based volumes, a difference of at least 25% was detected in all patients, with all but 2 having smaller 18F-FDG PET volumes. Of patients in whom 18F-FDG uptake was initially present but treatment subsequently failed, 83% demonstrated the first tumor progression within the region of abnormal 18F-FDG uptake. Conclusion: In comparison with MRI, 18F-FDG PET defined unique volumes for radiation dose escalation in the treatment of GBM. 18F-FDG PET volumes were predictive of survival and time to tumor progression in the treatment of patients with GBM.

Key Words: glioblastoma multiforme • PET • radiation dose escalation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Neuro OncolHome page
K. J. Stelzer, J. G. Douglas, D. A. Mankoff, D. L. Silbergeld, K. A. Krohn, G. E. Laramore, and A. M. Spence
Positron emission tomography-guided conformal fast neutron therapy for glioblastoma multiforme
Neuro-oncol, February 1, 2008; 10(1): 88 - 92.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
R. J. Francis, M. J. Byrne, A. A. van der Schaaf, J. A. Boucek, A. K. Nowak, M. Phillips, R. Price, A. P. Patrikeos, A. W. Musk, and M. J. Millward
Early Prediction of Response to Chemotherapy and Survival in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Using a Novel Semiautomated 3-Dimensional Volume-Based Analysis of Serial 18F-FDG PET Scans
J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2007; 48(9): 1449 - 1458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
W. Chen
Clinical Applications of PET in Brain Tumors
J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2007; 48(9): 1468 - 1481.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. A. Kwee, J. P. Ko, C. S. Jiang, M. R. Watters, and M. N. Coel
Solitary Brain Lesions Enhancing at MR Imaging: Evaluation with Fluorine 18 Fluorocholine PET
Radiology, August 1, 2007; 244(2): 557 - 565.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
D. A. Mankoff, J. F. Eary, J. M. Link, M. Muzi, J. G. Rajendran, A. M. Spence, and K. A. Krohn
Tumor-Specific Positron Emission Tomography Imaging in Patients: [18F] Fluorodeoxyglucose and Beyond
Clin. Cancer Res., June 15, 2007; 13(12): 3460 - 3469.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
M. Levivier, N. Massager, D. Wikler, J. Lorenzoni, S. Ruiz, D. Devriendt, P. David, F. Desmedt, S. Simon, P. Van Houtte, et al.
Use of Stereotactic PET Images in Dosimetry Planning of Radiosurgery for Brain Tumors: Clinical Experience and Proposed Classification
J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2004; 45(7): 1146 - 1154.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2002 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.