JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lalush, D. S.
Right arrow Articles by DiMeo, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lalush, D. S.
Right arrow Articles by DiMeo, A. J.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 43 No. 11 1578-1583
© 2002 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


Basic Science Investigations

An Observer Study Evaluating Dual-Plane Circular-Orbit Cone-Beam Brain SPECT

David S. Lalush, PhD and Andrew J. DiMeo, MS

Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina

Dual-plane circular-orbit cone-beam (DPCB) SPECT uses a pair of dissimilar cone-beam collimators to expand the axial field of view for brain SPECT. We applied observer study methodology to evaluate the improvement in detection of small defects in brain perfusion provided by DPCB SPECT, compared with conventional parallel-beam imaging. We also evaluated the effect of changing the radius of rotation on DPCB imaging. Methods: Images were realistically simulated using a brain phantom. High-count Monte Carlo simulations were performed for 4 imaging configurations: low-energy high-resolution parallel-beam imaging at a radius of rotation of 18 cm and DPCB imaging (52-cm focal length) at radii of rotation of 20, 24, and 28 cm. These distances corresponded to those required for our camera to clear the shoulders of a patient in the 5th, 50th, and 95th percentiles of shoulder width. Perfusion defects of ~1.8-cm diameter were simulated at 4 locations in the brain. Poisson noise was simulated, and images were reconstructed to create a set of 200 images for each of the 4 configurations. All reconstructions used ordered-subset expectation maximization with attenuation modeling. Eight observers viewed images on which the possible location of the defect was marked. The observers were trained using 384 images, were tested using 416 images, and rated on a continuous scale their confidence about the presence of a defect. Results: Using a paired t test for the estimated areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for each observer, we found that all 3 DPCB configurations resulted in higher areas under the ROC curve than did the parallel-beam configuration. Further, area under the ROC curve for the DPCB configurations improved with decreasing radius of rotation. All comparisons were significant at P < 0.05, except for DPCB 20 cm to DPCB 24 cm (P = 0.089). Conclusion: Use of a dual-plane cone beam is feasible for brain SPECT and better detects small perfusion defects than does a parallel beam, despite the possibility that the radius of rotation will need to be increased significantly to clear the patient’s shoulders. A dual-plane cone beam should be used with the shortest radius of rotation possible to maximize the detectability of small perfusion defects.

Key Words: brain SPECT • cone-beam SPECT




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
R. Accorsi
Brain Single-Photon Emission CT Physics Principles
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2008; 29(7): 1247 - 1256.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2002 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.