JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME Activity
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hung, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hung, J. C.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 43 No. 11 1495-1506
© 2002 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


Continuing Education

Comparison of Various Requirements of the Quality Assurance Procedures for 18F-FDG Injection*

Joseph C. Hung, PhD

Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota

The quality assurance (QA) requirements (i.e., test procedure, acceptance criteria, and testing schedule) for fludeoxyglucose 18F (18F-FDG) injection listed in the U.S. Pharmacopeia (USP); the draft Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls (CMC) issued by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA); and the European Pharmacopeia (EP) were compared. The FDA Modernization Act of 1997 requires that the QA of compounded PET drug products be in compliance with the PET compounding standards and official monographs included in the USP. However, the "sunset" clause of the PET section within the FDA Modernization Act of 1997 stipulates that all PET drug products, in due course, must meet the requirements for drug approval procedures and current good manufacturing practice, and the FDA has issued a draft CMC that includes QA specifications for 18F-FDG injection. The purpose of this article is to discuss the pros and cons of each of the QA tests stated in the USP, CMC, and EP and to propose a practical testing method for each required test, thereby helping end users to ensure the quality of the 18F-FDG injection product. It is hoped that this article will stimulate further cooperation among various countries worldwide in the development of a set of harmonized and sensible QA standards for all PET drug products.

Key Words: 18F-FDG injection • quality assurance • U.S. Pharmacopeia • Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls • Food and Drug Administration • European Pharmacopeia







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2002 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.