JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilkinson, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Mather, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wilkinson, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Mather, S. J.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 43 No. 10 1368-1376
© 2002 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


Basic Science Investigations

Evaluation of a Transgenic Mouse Model for Anti-Human CEA Radioimmunotherapeutics

Robert W. Wilkinson, PhD1, Elizabeth L. Ross, PhD1, David Ellison, BSc2, Wolfgang Zimmermann, PhD3, David Snary, PhD1 and Stephen J. Mather, PhD2

1 Applied Development Laboratory, Imperial Cancer Research Technology, St. Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom
2 Nuclear Medicine Group, Cancer Research U.K., St. Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom
3 Tumor Immunology Group, Department of Urology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Muenchen, Germany

In this study, a human carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) transgenic (CEA.Tg) mouse model was evaluated for the preclinical assessment of agents directed against CEA. Methods: Cell-type and organ-specific expression of CEA was studied in CEA.Tg mice derived from a colony that carries the complete human CEA gene together with flanking regulatory sequences and also in wild-type controls. Biodistribution studies were performed on wild-type and CEA.Tg mice by intravenous injection of 125I-labeled anti-CEA (PR1A3) or isotype control (IC) murine monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Studies were also performed on tumor-bearing CEA.Tg and nude mice. Results: As with humans, the CEA.Tg mice had low serum levels of CEA (mean, 8.8 ± 5.52 ng/mL), and cell-surface CEA expression was primarily localized in the gastrointestinal tract. Both mAbs showed similar biodistribution patterns in the wild-type mice, whereas in the CEA.Tg mice, PR1A3 specifically localized to the CEA-expressing tissues. In the gastrointestinal tract, the percentage injected dose for PR1A3 was significantly higher than that for IC mAb at all the time points sampled. In CEA.Tg mice bearing a murine tumor transfected with human CEA, PR1A3 targeted tissues with constitutive CEA expression and was retained at the tumor site at high levels, whereas in nude mice, PR1A3 localized only to the site of the transplanted tumor. Conclusion: These results demonstrate the targeting potential of the anti-CEA antibody, PR1A3, and emphasize the value of using a transgenic model in preclinical studies.

Key Words: carcinoembryonic antigen • transgenic mice • radiolabeled antibody




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.Home page
A. L. Servin
Pathogenesis of Afa/Dr Diffusely Adhering Escherichia coli
Clin. Microbiol. Rev., April 1, 2005; 18(2): 264 - 292.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2002 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.