JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McCarthy, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Welch, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McCarthy, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Welch, M. J.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 43 No. 1 117-124
© 2002 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


Basic Science Investigations

Radiosynthesis, In Vitro Validation, and In Vivo Evaluation of 18F-Labeled COX-1 and COX-2 Inhibitors

Timothy J. McCarthy, PhD1, Ahmed U. Sheriff, MS1, Matthew J. Graneto, BS2, John J. Talley, PhD2 and Michael J. Welch, PhD1

1 Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
2 Discovery Research, Pharmacia Corporation, St. Louis, Missouri

In this article, we describe the radiosynthesis and evaluation of 18F-labeled cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors. 18F-SC63217 is selective to COX-1 and has a COX-1 inhibitory concentration of 50% (IC50) < 10 nmol/L and a COX-2 IC50 > 100 µmol/L. 18F-SC58125 has IC50 values of >100 µmol/L (COX-1) and <86 nmol/L (COX-2). Methods: SC63217 and SC58125 were both labeled with 18F by nucleophilic displacement of a trimethylammonium triflate salt using a dedicated microwave cavity. Each compound was evaluated in vitro using a murine macrophage cell line (J774). COX-2 was stimulated in these cells by treatment with lipopolysaccharide and interferon-{gamma}. Both radiotracers were further investigated in vivo using rat biodistribution techniques. Brain uptake of the COX-2 inhibitor, 18F-SC58125, was further investigated by brain PET of a baboon. Results: The in vitro studies showed that uptake of 18F-SC58125 was increased in stimulated cells and was totally inhibited by the addition of nonradioactive SC58125. In contrast, no increase in uptake was seen for 18F-SC63217. In the biodistribution experiments, 18F-SC63217 showed much higher uptake in the small intestine (an organ known to express high levels of COX-1) than did 18F-SC58125. Higher levels of 18F-SC58125 were observed in the kidney, an organ known to contain high levels of COX-2 rather than COX-1. 18F-SC58125 was retained in brain tissue. PET images of the baboon showed no regional distribution of the radiotracer in the brain. Conclusion: We have developed a radiosynthetic route that can yield 18F-labeled selective inhibitors of COX-1 or COX-2. Both compounds have been fully characterized in vitro and in vivo. Our results indicate that 18F-SC58125 has potential as a marker of COX-2 activity but that, because of high nonspecific binding, 18F-SC63217 was not a good choice as a marker of COX-1.

Key Words: cyclooxygenase • PET • 18F • enzyme inhibitors • SC58125 • SC63217




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Biswal, D. L. Resnick, J. M. Hoffman, and S. S. Gambhir
Molecular Imaging: Integration of Molecular Imaging into the Musculoskeletal Imaging Practice
Radiology, September 1, 2007; 244(3): 651 - 671.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
E. F.J. de Vries, A. van Waarde, A. R. Buursma, and W. Vaalburg
Synthesis and In Vivo Evaluation of 18F-Desbromo-DuP-697 as a PET Tracer for Cyclooxygenase-2 Expression
J. Nucl. Med., October 1, 2003; 44(10): 1700 - 1706.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
T. F. Massoud and S. S. Gambhir
Molecular imaging in living subjects: seeing fundamental biological processes in a new light
Genes & Dev., March 1, 2003; 17(5): 545 - 580.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
S. M. Lippman and W. K. Hong
Cancer Prevention Science and Practice
Cancer Res., September 15, 2002; 62(18): 5119 - 5125.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2002 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.