JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carrasquillo, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Dahut, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carrasquillo, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Dahut, W.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 42 No. 9 1359-1363
© 2001 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


Clinical Investigations

Alendronate Does Not Interfere with 99mTc-Methylene Diphosphonate Bone Scanning

Jorge A. Carrasquillo, Millie Whatley, Valerie Dyer, William D. Figg and William Dahut

Nuclear Medicine Department, Warren G. Magnuson Clinical Center; and Clinical Pharmacokinetics Section, Medicine Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland

Several studies have found that administration of etidronate results in competitive interference with 99mTc-labeled bone scanning reagents. In contrast, in other studies this problem was not encountered with other bisphosphonates. Methods: We prospectively studied 9 patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer. 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate (MDP) bone scanning was performed before they received alendronate, and scanning was repeated a mean of 16.6 d afterward, when the patients had been receiving 40 mg alendronate daily for a mean of 6 d. In addition, 7 patients who underwent delayed scanning when they had been receiving alendronate for a mean of 111 d were also restudied. Quantitative whole-body bone scanning was performed, and radioactivity deposited in the bone metastasis was determined using region-of-interest analysis. Results: A <6% increase in whole-body retention of 99mTc-MDP was seen on the initial postalendronate scan compared with the baseline scan. No significant differences in activity were seen in the bone lesion evaluated on the baseline and initial postalendronate studies. The delayed postalendronate scan generally showed similar or higher tracer accumulation compared with the baseline scan. Conclusion: Alendronate did not competitively inhibit uptake of 99mTc-MDP in the skeleton or tumor metastasis. Use of alendronate before bone scanning is unlikely to result in decreased detection of lesions or falsely decreased 99mTc-MDP activity at metastatic bone tumor sites.

Key Words: prostate • bisphosphonate • 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate • bone metastasis




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
N. Pandit-Taskar, M. Batraki, and C. R. Divgi
Radiopharmaceutical Therapy for Palliation of Bone Pain from Osseous Metastases
J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2004; 45(8): 1358 - 1365.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2001 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.