HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Riddell, C. Articles by Bacharach, S. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Riddell, C. Articles by Bacharach, S. L.

Noise Reduction in Oncology FDG PET Images by Iterative Reconstruction: A Quantitative Assessment

National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland

Tumor detection depends on the contrast between tumor activity and background activity and on the image noise in these 2 regions. The lower the image noise, the easier the tumor detection. Tumor activity contrast is determined by physiology. Noise, however, is affected by many factors, including the choice of reconstruction algorithm. Previous simulation and phantom measurements indicated that the ordered-subset expectation maximization (OSEM) algorithm may produce less noisy images than does the usual filtered backprojection (FBP) method, at equivalent resolution. To see if this prediction would hold in actual clinical situations, we quantified noise in clinical images reconstructed with both OSEM and FBP. Methods: Three patients (2 with colon cancer, 1 with breast cancer) were imaged with FDG PET using a "gated replicate" technique that permitted accurate measurement of noise at each pixel. Each static image was acquired as a gated image sequence, using a pulse generator with a 1-s period, yielding 40 replicate images over the 10- to 15-min imaging time. The images were or were not precorrected for attenuation and were reconstructed with both FBP and OSEM at comparable resolution. From these data, images of pixel mean, SD, and signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) could be produced, reflecting only noise caused by the statistical fluctuations in the emission process. Results: Noise did not vary greatly over each FBP image, even when image intensity varied greatly from one region to the next, causing S/N to be worse in low-activity regions than in high-activity regions. In contrast, OSEM had high noise in hot regions and low noise in cold regions. OSEM had a much better S/N than did FBP in cold regions of the image, such as the lungs (in the attenuation-corrected images), where improvements in S/N averaged 160%. Improvements with OSEM were less dramatic in hotter areas such as the liver (averaging 25% improvement in the attenuation-corrected images). In very hot tumors, FBP actually produced higher S/Ns than did OSEM. Conclusion: We conclude that OSEM reconstruction can significantly reduce image noise, especially in relatively low-count regions. OSEM reconstruction failed to improve S/N in very hot tumors, in which S/N may already be adequate for tumor detection.

Key Words: PET • iterative reconstruction • image noise • lesion detection

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Quon, S. Napel, C. F. Beaulieu, and S. S. Gambhir "Flying Through" and "Flying Around" a PET/CT Scan: Pilot Study and Development of 3D Integrated 18F-FDG PET/CT for Virtual Bronchoscopy and Colonoscopy J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2006; 47(7): 1081 - 1087. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Lodge, R. D. Badawi, R. Gilbert, P. E. Dibos, and B. R. Line Comparison of 2-Dimensional and 3-Dimensional Acquisition for 18F-FDG PET Oncology Studies Performed on an LSO-Based Scanner J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2006; 47(1): 23 - 31. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. J. Jaskowiak, J. A. Bianco, S. B. Perlman, and J. P. Fine Influence of Reconstruction Iterations on 18F-FDG PET/CT Standardized Uptake Values J. Nucl. Med., March 1, 2005; 46(3): 424 - 428. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Lubberink, R. Boellaard, A. P. van der Weerdt, F. C. Visser, and A. A. Lammertsma Quantitative Comparison of Analytic and Iterative Reconstruction Methods in 2- and 3-Dimensional Dynamic Cardiac 18F-FDG PET J. Nucl. Med., December 1, 2004; 45(12): 2008 - 2015. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Seret, R. Boellaard, and A. van der Weerdt Number of Iterations When Comparing MLEM/OSEM with FBP J. Nucl. Med., December 1, 2004; 45(12): 2125 - 2126. [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Schoder, Y. E. Erdi, K. Chao, M. Gonen, S. M. Larson, and H. W.D. Yeung Clinical Implications of Different Image Reconstruction Parameters for Interpretation of Whole-Body PET Studies in Cancer Patients J. Nucl. Med., April 1, 2004; 45(4): 559 - 566. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. P. van der Weerdt, R. Boellaard, P. Knaapen, C. A. Visser, A. A. Lammertsma, and F. C. Visser Postinjection Transmission Scanning in Myocardial 18F-FDG PET Studies Using Both Filtered Backprojection and Iterative Reconstruction J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2004; 45(2): 169 - 175. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Tarantola, F. Zito, and P. Gerundini PET Instrumentation and Reconstruction Algorithms in Whole-Body Applications J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2003; 44(5): 756 - 769. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]