JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lövqvist, A.
Right arrow Articles by Larson, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lövqvist, A.
Right arrow Articles by Larson, S. M.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 42 No. 8 1281-1287
© 2001 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


BASIC SCIENCE INVESTIGATIONS

PET Imaging of 86Y-Labeled Anti-Lewis Y Monoclonal Antibodies in a Nude Mouse Model: Comparison Between 86Y and 111In Radiolabels

Anna Lövqvist, John L. Humm, Arif Sheikh, Ron D. Finn, Jacek Koziorowski, Shutian Ruan, Keith S. Pentlow, Achim Jungbluth, Sydney Welt, Fook T. Lee, Martin W. Brechbiel and Steven M. Larson

Nuclear Medicine Service, Departments of Radiology and Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, New York, New York; Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Austin and Repatriation Medical Center, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia; and Radioimmune and Inorganic Chemistry Section, Radiation Oncology Branch, Division of Clinical Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland

Absorbed doses in 90Y radioimmunotherapy are usually estimated by extrapolating from 111In imaging data. PET using 86Y (ß+ 33%; half-life, 14.7 h) as a surrogate radiolabel could be a more accurate alternative. The aim of this study was to evaluate an 86Y-labeled monoclonal antibody (mAb) as a PET imaging agent and to compare the biodistribution of 86Y- and 111In-labeled mAb. Methods: The humanized anti-Lewis Y mAb hu3S193 was labeled with 111In or 86Y through CHX-A''-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid chelation. In vitro cell binding and cellular retention of radiolabeled hu3S193 were evaluated using HCT-15 colon carcinoma cells, a cell line expressing Lewis Y. Nude mice bearing HCT-15 xenografts were injected with 86Y-hu3S193 or 111In-hu3S193. The biodistribution was studied by measurements of dissected tissues as well as by PET and planar imaging. Results: The overall radiochemical yield in hu3S193 labeling and purification was 42% ± 2% (n = 2) and 76% ± 3% (n = 6) for 86Y and 111In, respectively. Both radioimmunoconjugates specifically bound to HCT-15 cells. When cellular retention of hu3S193 was studied using 111In-hu3S193, 80% of initially cell-bound 111In activity was released into the medium as high-molecular-weight compounds within 8 h. When coadministered, in vivo tumor uptake of 86Y-hu3S193 and 111In-hu3S193 reached maximum values of 30 ± 6 and 29 ± 6 percentage injected dose per gram and tumor sites were easily identifiable by PET and planar imaging, respectively. Conclusion: At 2 d after injection of 111In-hu3S193 and 86Y-hu3S193 radioimmunoconjugates, the uptake of 111In and 86Y activity was generally similar in most tissues. After 4 d, however, the concentration of 86Y activity was significantly higher in several tissues, including tumor and bone tissue. Accordingly, the quantitative information offered by PET, combined with the presumably identical biodistribution of 86Y and 90Y radiolabels, should enable more accurate absorbed dose estimates in 90Y radioimmunotherapy.

Key Words: 86Y • PET imaging • radioimmunotherapy • Lewis Y • 3S193 antibody




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The OncologistHome page
G. A.M.S. van Dongen, G. W.M. Visser, M. N. Lub-de Hooge, E. G. de Vries, and L. R. Perk
Immuno-PET: A Navigator in Monoclonal Antibody Development and Applications
Oncologist, December 1, 2007; 12(12): 1379 - 1389.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
W. Cai, T. Olafsen, X. Zhang, Q. Cao, S. S. Gambhir, L. E. Williams, A. M. Wu, and X. Chen
PET Imaging of Colorectal Cancer in Xenograft-Bearing Mice by Use of an 18F-Labeled T84.66 Anti-Carcinoembryonic Antigen Diabody
J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2007; 48(2): 304 - 310.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
V. Kenanova, T. Olafsen, L. E. Williams, N. H. Ruel, J. Longmate, P. J. Yazaki, J. E. Shively, D. Colcher, A. A. Raubitschek, and A. M. Wu
Radioiodinated versus Radiometal-Labeled Anti-Carcinoembryonic Antigen Single-Chain Fv-Fc Antibody Fragments: Optimal Pharmacokinetics for Therapy
Cancer Res., January 15, 2007; 67(2): 718 - 726.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
M. P. Kelly, F. T. Lee, F. E. Smyth, M. W. Brechbiel, and A. M. Scott
Enhanced Efficacy of 90Y-Radiolabeled Anti-Lewis Y Humanized Monoclonal Antibody hu3S193 and Paclitaxel Combined-Modality Radioimmunotherapy in a Breast Cancer Model
J. Nucl. Med., April 1, 2006; 47(4): 716 - 725.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
G. J. Kelloff, K. A. Krohn, S. M. Larson, R. Weissleder, D. A. Mankoff, J. M. Hoffman, J. M. Link, K. Z. Guyton, W. C. Eckelman, H. I. Scher, et al.
The Progress and Promise of Molecular Imaging Probes in Oncologic Drug Development
Clin. Cancer Res., November 15, 2005; 11(22): 7967 - 7985.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
L. R. Perk, G. W.M. Visser, M. J.W.D. Vosjan, M. Stigter-van Walsum, B. M. Tijink, C. R. Leemans, and G. A.M.S. van Dongen
89Zr as a PET Surrogate Radioisotope for Scouting Biodistribution of the Therapeutic Radiometals 90Y and 177Lu in Tumor-Bearing Nude Mice After Coupling to the Internalizing Antibody Cetuximab
J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2005; 46(11): 1898 - 1906.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
S. Vallabhajosula, I. Kuji, K. A. Hamacher, S. Konishi, L. Kostakoglu, P. A. Kothari, M. I. Milowski, D. M. Nanus, N. H. Bander, and S. J. Goldsmith
Pharmacokinetics and Biodistribution of 111In- and 177Lu-Labeled J591 Antibody Specific for Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen: Prediction of 90Y-J591 Radiation Dosimetry Based on 111In or 177Lu?
J. Nucl. Med., April 1, 2005; 46(4): 634 - 641.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
S. Shen, A. Forero, A. F. LoBuglio, H. Breitz, M.B. Khazaeli, D. R. Fisher, W. Wang, and R. F. Meredith
Patient-Specific Dosimetry of Pretargeted Radioimmunotherapy Using CC49 Fusion Protein in Patients with Gastrointestinal Malignancies
J. Nucl. Med., April 1, 2005; 46(4): 642 - 651.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
Y. S. Jhanwar and C. Divgi
Current Status of Therapy of Solid Tumors
J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2005; 46(1_suppl): 141S - 150S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
I. Verel, G. W.M. Visser, and G. A. van Dongen
The Promise of Immuno-PET in Radioimmunotherapy
J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2005; 46(1_suppl): 164S - 171S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
D. E. Gonzalez Trotter, R. M. Manjeshwar, M. Doss, C. Shaller, M. K. Robinson, R. Tandon, G. P. Adams, and L. P. Adler
Quantitation of Small-Animal 124I Activity Distributions Using a Clinical PET/CT Scanner
J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2004; 45(7): 1237 - 1244.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
I. Verel, G. W.M. Visser, R. Boellaard, O. C. Boerman, J. van Eerd, G. B. Snow, A. A. Lammertsma, and G. A.M.S van Dongen
Quantitative 89Zr Immuno-PET for In Vivo Scouting of 90Y-Labeled Monoclonal Antibodies in Xenograft-Bearing Nude Mice
J. Nucl. Med., October 1, 2003; 44(10): 1663 - 1670.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
S. Palm, R. M. Enmon Jr., C. Matei, K. S. Kolbert, S. Xu, P. B. Zanzonico, R. L. Finn, J. A. Koutcher, S. M. Larson, and G. Sgouros
Pharmacokinetics and Biodistribution of 86Y-Trastuzumab for 90Y Dosimetry in an Ovarian Carcinoma Model: Correlative MicroPET and MRI
J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2003; 44(7): 1148 - 1155.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
T. F. Massoud and S. S. Gambhir
Molecular imaging in living subjects: seeing fundamental biological processes in a new light
Genes & Dev., March 1, 2003; 17(5): 545 - 580.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
G. L. Griffiths, S. V. Govindan, R. M. Sharkey, D. R. Fisher, and D. M. Goldenberg
90Y-DOTA-hLL2: An Agent for Radioimmunotherapy of Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2003; 44(1): 77 - 84.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
S. Shen, R. F. Meredith, J. Duan, D. J. Macey, M.B. Khazaeli, F. Robert, and A. F. LoBuglio
Improved Prediction of Myelotoxicity Using a Patient-Specific Imaging Dose Estimate for Non-Marrow-Targeting 90Y-Antibody Therapy
J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2002; 43(9): 1245 - 1253.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2001 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.