JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Berridge, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Berridge, M. S.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 42 No. 7 1077-1083
© 2001 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


BASIC SCIENCE INVESTIGATIONS

Usefulness and Pitfalls of Planar {gamma}-Scintigraphy for Measuring Aerosol Deposition in the Lungs: A Monte Carlo Investigation

Zhenghong Lee, Michael Ljungberg, Raymond F. Muzic, Jr. and Marc S. Berridge

Nuclear Medicine Division, Radiology Department, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio; and Radiation Physics Department, Jubileum Institute, Lund University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden

Planar {gamma}-scintigraphy is often used to quantify pulmonary deposition patterns from aerosol inhalers. The results are quite different from those obtained using 3-dimensional PET and SPECT. The purpose of this study was to characterize the effects of scatter and tissue attenuation on the distribution of radiolabeled aerosol as measured by planar scintigraphy using Monte Carlo simulations. This study also investigated the applicability of a few correction methods used in inhalation studies. Methods: Body density maps were derived from CT scans. Regions of interest—lungs, major airways, and esophagus—were defined from the same CT volume. Two radioactivity source distribution patterns in the lung, uniform and nonuniform, were used. A Monte Carlo program, SIMIND, was used to generate anterior and posterior {gamma}-images of the composed inhalation distributions for 2 energy windows, photopeak (127–153 keV) and scatter (92–125 keV). The effects of scatter and attenuation were estimated on the basis of the imaging components separated from the simulation. A scatter correction method and 2 attenuation correction methods, all applied to inhalation scintigraphy, were evaluated using the simulated images. Results: The amount of scatter ranges from 24% to approximately 29% in the lungs and from 29% to approximately 35% in the central (airway or esophagus) region on the planar images. Significant differences were found among regions and between source distributions (P < 0.05). The fraction k used for dual-energy–based scatter correction also varied and was found to be less than the commonly used k = 0.5. The simplified narrow-beam attenuation correction and the effective (broad-beam) correction methods were found to either under- or overcorrect the regional activities. Conclusion: The amount of scatter and tissue attenuation in the thorax region depends on source distribution and body attenuation. In applying planar scintigraphy for aerosol inhalation studies, it is difficult to obtain precise quantitative measurements because of the uncertainties associated with scatter and attenuation corrections. Accurate corrections require knowledge of both source and density distributions.

Key Words: planar scintigraphy • aerosol lung deposition • scatter • attenuation correction







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2001 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.