JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Munk, O. L.
Right arrow Articles by Keiding, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Munk, O. L.
Right arrow Articles by Keiding, S.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 42 No. 5 795-801
© 2001 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


BASIC SCIENCE INVESTIGATIONS

Liver Kinetics of Glucose Analogs Measured in Pigs by PET: Importance of Dual-Input Blood Sampling

Ole L. Munk, Ludvik Bass, Klaus Roelsgaard, Dirk Bender, Søren B. Hansen and Susanne Keiding

PET-Center and Department of Medicine V, Aarhus University Hospital, and Institute for Experimental Clinical Research, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; and Department of Mathematics, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

Metabolic processes studied by PET are quantified traditionally using compartmental models, which relate the time course of the tracer concentration in tissue to that in arterial blood. For liver studies, the use of arterial input may, however, cause systematic errors to the estimated kinetic parameters, because of ignorance of the dual blood supply from the hepatic artery and the portal vein to the liver. Methods: Six pigs underwent PET after [15O]carbon monoxide inhalation, 3-O-[11C]methylglucose (MG) injection, and [18F]FDG injection. For the glucose scans, PET data were acquired for 90 min. Hepatic arterial and portal venous blood samples and flows were measured during the scan. The dual-input function was calculated as the flow-weighted input. Results: For both MG and FDG, the compartmental analysis using arterial input led to systematic underestimation of the rate constants for rapid blood–tissue exchange. Furthermore, the arterial input led to absurdly low estimates for the extracellular volume compared with the independently measured hepatic blood volume of 0.25 ± 0.01 mL/mL (milliliter blood per milliliter liver tissue). In contrast, the use of a dual-input function provided parameter estimates that were in agreement with liver physiology. Using the dual-input function, the clearances into the liver cells (K1 = 1.11 ± 0.11 mL/min/mL for MG; K1 = 1.07 ± 0.19 mL/min/mL for FDG) were comparable with the liver blood flow (F = 1.02 ± 0.05 mL/min/mL). As required physiologically, the extracellular volumes estimated using the dual-input function were larger than the hepatic blood volume. The linear Gjedde–Patlak analysis produced parameter estimates that were unaffected by the choice of input function, because this analysis was confined to time scales for which the arterial-input and dual-input functions were very similar. Conclusion: Compartmental analysis of MG and FDG kinetics using dynamic PET data requires measurements of dual-input activity concentrations. Using the dual-input function, physiologically reasonable parameter estimates of K1, k2, and Vp were obtained, whereas the use of conventional arterial sampling underestimated these parameters compared with independent measurements of hepatic flow and hepatic blood volume. In contrast, the linear Gjedde–Patlak analysis, being less informative but more robust, gave similar parameter estimates (K, V) with both input functions.

Key Words: liver glucose metabolism • FDG kinetics • compartment model • PET • liver blood flow




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
M. Sorensen, O. L. Munk, F. V. Mortensen, A. K. Olsen, D. Bender, L. Bass, and S. Keiding
Hepatic uptake and metabolism of galactose can be quantified in vivo by 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxygalactose positron emission tomography
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, July 1, 2008; 295(1): G27 - G36.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
K Murase, S Miyazaki, and X Yang
An efficient method for calculating kinetic parameters in a dual-input single-compartment model
Br. J. Radiol., May 1, 2007; 80(953): 371 - 375.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
P. Iozzo, A. Gastaldelli, M. J. Jarvisalo, J. Kiss, R. Borra, E. Buzzigoli, A. Viljanen, G. Naum, T. Viljanen, V. Oikonen, et al.
18F-FDG Assessment of Glucose Disposal and Production Rates During Fasting and Insulin Stimulation: A Validation Study
J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2006; 47(6): 1016 - 1022.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. Bertoldo, J. Price, C. Mathis, S. Mason, D. Holt, C. Kelley, C. Cobelli, and D. E. Kelley
Quantitative Assessment of Glucose Transport in Human Skeletal Muscle: Dynamic Positron Emission Tomography Imaging of [O-Methyl-11C]3-O-Methyl-D-Glucose
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2005; 90(3): 1752 - 1759.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
P. Iozzo, A. K. Turpeinen, T. Takala, V. Oikonen, J. Bergman, T. Gronroos, E. Ferrannini, P. Nuutila, and J. Knuuti
Defective Liver Disposal of Free Fatty Acids in Patients with Impaired Glucose Tolerance
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2004; 89(7): 3496 - 3502.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
O. L. Munk, L. Bass, H. Feng, and S. Keiding
Determination of Regional Flow by Use of Intravascular PET Tracers: Microvascular Theory and Experimental Validation for Pig Livers
J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2003; 44(11): 1862 - 1870.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
O. L. Munk, S. Keiding, and L. Bass
Impulse-response function of splanchnic circulation with model-independent constraints: theory and experimental validation
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, October 1, 2003; 285(4): G671 - G680.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
P. Iozzo, K. Hallsten, V. Oikonen, K. A. Virtanen, R. Parkkola, J. Kemppainen, O. Solin, F. Lonnqvist, E. Ferrannini, J. Knuuti, et al.
Effects of Metformin and Rosiglitazone Monotherapy on Insulin-Mediated Hepatic Glucose Uptake and Their Relation to Visceral Fat in Type 2 Diabetes
Diabetes Care, July 1, 2003; 26(7): 2069 - 2074.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
P. Iozzo, K. Hallsten, V. Oikonen, K. A. Virtanen, J. Kemppainen, O. Solin, E. Ferrannini, J. Knuuti, and P. Nuutila
Insulin-Mediated Hepatic Glucose Uptake Is Impaired in Type 2 Diabetes: Evidence for a Relationship with Glycemic Control
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2003; 88(5): 2055 - 2060.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
P. Iozzo, F. Geisler, V. Oikonen, M. Maki, T. Takala, O. Solin, E. Ferrannini, J. Knuuti, and P. Nuutila
Insulin Stimulates Liver Glucose Uptake in Humans: An 18F-FDG PET Study
J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2003; 44(5): 682 - 689.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
K. Kaarstad, D. Bender, L. Bentzen, O. L. Munk, and S. Keiding
Metabolic Fate of 18F-FDG in Mice Bearing Either SCCVII Squamous Cell Carcinoma or C3H Mammary Carcinoma
J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2002; 43(7): 940 - 947.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
O. L. Munk, S. Keiding, G. Brix, M. E. Bellemann, S. I. Ziegler, and U. Haberkorn
Quantification of 18F-FDG Uptake in the Liver Using Dynamic PET
J. Nucl. Med., March 1, 2002; 43(3): 439 - 441.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
D. Bender, O. L. Munk, H.-Q. Feng, and S. Keiding
Metabolites of 18F-FDG and 3-O-11C-Methylglucose in Pig Liver
J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2001; 42(11): 1673 - 1678.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2001 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.