JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, S. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, S. R.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 42 No. 3 520-526
© 2001 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


SPECIAL CONTRIBUTION

MIRD Pamphlet No. 18: Administered Cumulated Activity for Ventilation Studies

Stephen R. Thomas, MIRD Committee: E.E. Watson (Chair), W.E. Bolch, A.B. Brill, N.D. Charkes, D.R. Fisher, M.T. Hays, R.W. Howell, R.F. Meredith, J.S. Robertson, G. Sgourous, J.A. Siegel, S.R. Thomas, B.W. Wessels

Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio

There has been no consensus on a standard calculational approach regarding the concept of administered activity in ventilation studies involving inhaled radioisotope gas or radioaerosols. This is caused in part by a lack of knowledge regarding the actual activity that enters the lung space (as opposed to activity introduced into the delivery system) and to the extended administration times (ta) associated with delivery protocols. Methods: This pamphlet reviewed the three primary ventilation procedures, including rebreathing-system protocols, continuous-flow generator output techniques, and radioaerosol delivery systems. Results: For each technique, an analytic expression has been derived for a new parameter called lung administered cumulated activity, ÃL(0,ta), which is the cumulated activity in the lungs during the administration phase. In addition, another potentially useful parameter has been defined—the mean administered activity for ventilation procedures, which normalizes the administered cumulated activity in the lung over the administration period and may serve to standardize descriptions of protocols between patients and institutions. Examples are provided that illustrate these new concepts for typical ventilation protocol administration parameters. Conclusion: The models presented can be employed to evaluate lung administered cumulated activity for use in ventilation dose estimate reports as a function of explicit variables (e.g., spirometer volume, generator output rate, wash-in half-time, administration time). In practice, it is recommended that dose estimate reports be based on measurements of cumulated activity in the lung over the administration period and normalized to this administered cumulated activity.

Key Words: ventilation • radioisotope ventilation studies • cumulated activity • radiation dose







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2001 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.