JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stabin, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Breitz, H. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stabin, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Breitz, H. B.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 42 No. 3 492-498
© 2001 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


BASIC SCIENCE INVESTIGATIONS

Contribution to Red Marrow Absorbed Dose from Total Body Activity: A Correction to the MIRD Method

Michael G. Stabin, Jeffry A. Siegel, Richard B. Sparks, Keith F. Eckerman and Hazel B. Breitz

Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee

The contribution to red marrow absorbed dose from ß-emitting radionuclides distributed uniformly in the total body can be overestimated using either MIRD 11 or MIRDOSE3. The S value assigned to the red marrow target region from activity distributed in the remainder of the body is of particular concern. The assumption that the specific absorbed fraction for total body irradiating red marrow and other skeletal tissues is the inverse of the total-body mass can result in an inappropriate remainder-of-body contribution to marrow dose. We evaluated differences in the calculation of marrow dose using MIRD 11 and MIRDOSE3 formulations and developed methods to correct the results from either to remove inappropriate contributions. When bone takes up significantly less activity than is predicted from an apportionment of remainder-tissue activity based on mass, the standard remainder-of-body correction may substantially overestimate the electron component of the S value from remainder tissues to red marrow using either MIRD 11 or MIRDOSE3. If bone takes up activity, this contribution is negligible using MIRD 11 S values but remains with MIRDOSE3 S values. This overestimate can be significant, particularly when the residence time of activity in the remainder of the body is much higher than in the red marrow and a different correction is needed. As the ratio of the remainder of body to marrow residence time is lowered, the overestimate becomes less significant. Conclusion: In this article, we show the magnitude of this overestimate (which is most important for nuclides with large "nonpenetrating" emission components and for pharmaceuticals that have a large ratio of remainder of body to marrow residence times), show the appropriate corrections to be made in each case, and propose a new method for calculating marrow dose contributions that will avoid this complication in future applications. Because all models give approximate doses for real patients, with uncertainties within those involved in these corrections, we do not suggest that changes be made to existing marrow dose estimates. We suggest only that future calculations be as accurate as possible.

Key Words: internal dose assessment • red marrow




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
S. Vallabhajosula, S. J. Goldsmith, K. A. Hamacher, L. Kostakoglu, S. Konishi, M. I. Milowski, D. M. Nanus, and N. H. Bander
Prediction of Myelotoxicity Based on Bone Marrow Radiation-Absorbed Dose: Radioimmunotherapy Studies Using 90Y- and 177Lu-Labeled J591 Antibodies Specific for Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen
J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2005; 46(5): 850 - 858.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
S. Pauwels, R. Barone, S. Walrand, F. Borson-Chazot, R. Valkema, L. K. Kvols, E. P. Krenning, and F. Jamar
Practical Dosimetry of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy with 90Y-Labeled Somatostatin Analogs
J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2005; 46(1_suppl): 92S - 98S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
B. W. Wessels, W. E. Bolch, L. G. Bouchet, H. B. Breitz, G. L. DeNardo, R. F. Meredith, M. G. Stabin, and G. Sgouros
Bone Marrow Dosimetry Using Blood-Based Models for Radiolabeled Antibody Therapy: A Multiinstitutional Comparison
J. Nucl. Med., October 1, 2004; 45(10): 1725 - 1733.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
B. de Keizer, A. Hoekstra, M. W. Konijnenberg, F. de Vos, B. Lambert, P. P. van Rijk, C. J.M. Lips, and J. M.H. de Klerk
Bone Marrow Dosimetry and Safety of High 131I Activities Given After Recombinant Human Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone to Treat Metastatic Differentiated Thyroid Cancer
J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2004; 45(9): 1549 - 1554.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
J. A. Siegel, D. Yeldell, D. M. Goldenberg, M. G. Stabin, R. B. Sparks, R. M. Sharkey, A. Brenner, and R. D. Blumenthal
Red Marrow Radiation Dose Adjustment Using Plasma FLT3-L Cytokine Levels: Improved Correlations Between Hematologic Toxicity and Bone Marrow Dose for Radioimmunotherapy Patients
J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2003; 44(1): 67 - 76.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2001 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.