JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ford, P. V.
Right arrow Articles by Dhekne, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ford, P. V.
Right arrow Articles by Dhekne, R. D.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 42 No. 3 454-459
© 2001 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


BASIC SCIENCE INVESTIGATIONS

Overestimation of the LVEF by Quantitative Gated SPECT in Simulated Left Ventricles

Patrick V. Ford, Sofia N. Chatziioannou, Warren H. Moore and Ramesh D. Dhekne

Nuclear Medicine Section, Department of Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston; Department of Nuclear Medicine, St. Luke’s Episcopal Hospital, Houston; and Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Texas

During routine myocardial perfusion imaging, a common observation is that patients with normal cardiac function and small hearts, in particular small women, have higher left ventricular ejection fractions (LVEFs), as measured by quantitative gated SPECT (QGS) software, than anticipated, often markedly so. The goal of this project was to determine if the QGS LVEF varies with the change in end-diastolic left ventricular volume (EDV) and in particular to verify that the clinically observed phenomenon of falsely elevated QGS LVEF in patients with small hearts is actually occurring. Methods: A series of mathematically defined left ventricles (LVs) was produced by varying the EDV and targeted LVEF (tLVEF). These were created using concentric hemiellipsoids with nine different EDVs. The tLVEF was varied from 15% to 75% by 5% increments for a total of 13 different ejection fractions. These datasets were then smoothed, creating a total of 234 sets. The smoothed and unsmoothed images were then processed using QGS software. The LVEFs and EDVs were recorded. Results: For lower LVEFs the agreement between the QGS LVEF and the tLVEF is good. A marked overestimation occurs when the EDVs are low and the ejection fractions are in the higher range. This effect is greater in the smoothed images. Conclusion: An artifactual increase in the LVEF can occur when measurements are made with the QGS software. These data argue against using QGS LVEF for monitoring the LVEF in patients with small hearts. Our data imply that a mildly decreased LVEF may still appear to be in the normal range when measured by QGS software.

Key Words: ejection fraction • gating • myocardial perfusion imaging • quantitative gated SPECT software




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
B. Feng, A. Sitek, and G. T. Gullberg
Calculation of the Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Without Edge Detection: Application to Small Hearts
J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2002; 43(6): 786 - 794.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2001 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.