|
|
||||||||
CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS |
Nuclear Medicine Service, Department of Surgery, and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
The purpose of this study was to compare the results of isotope injection the morning of surgery (1-d protocol) with isotope injection the day before surgery (2-d protocol) in patients having sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for breast cancer. Methods: The 1-d (protocol 1) and 2-d (protocol 2) protocols included 514 and 152 patients, respectively, treated contemporaneously by surgeons experienced with the SLN biopsy technique. All had preoperative lymphoscintigraphy (LSG) and SLN biopsy using both blue dye and 99mTcsulfur colloid. All patients had a single-site intradermal injection of unfiltered 99mTcsulfur colloid in 0.05 mL normal saline: 3.7 MBq (0.1 mCi) on the morning of surgery for protocol 1 and 18.5 MBq (0.5 mCi) on the afternoon before surgery for protocol 2. Results: The patients in protocols 1 and 2 were comparable in terms of age, tumor size, tumor location, histologic type, node positivity, and frequency of a previous surgical biopsy. Comparing protocols 1 and 2, early (30 min) LSG images found the SLN equally often (69% vs. 68%). Isotope identified the SLN equally often at surgery (93% vs. 97%) as did isotope plus dye (98% vs. 99%). A comparable number of SLNs was found (2.5 vs. 2.8 per axilla), and the concordance between isotope and dye in the SLN was also comparable (97% vs. 95%). Late LSG images (at 2 h, possible only for protocol 2) identified the SLN in significantly more patients compared with early images (86% vs. 68%). Conclusion: With unfiltered 99mTcsulfur colloid injected intradermally, the results of SLN biopsy under the 1-d and 2-d protocols are virtually identical. A 2-d protocol allows increased efficiency in scheduling, both for nuclear medicine physicians and for the operating room, with no compromise in the effectiveness of SLN mapping.
Key Words: breast cancer lymphatic mapping 2-d protocol
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Pandit-Taskar, L. T. Dauer, L. Montgomery, J. St. Germain, P. B. Zanzonico, and C. R. Divgi Organ and Fetal Absorbed Dose Estimates from 99mTc-Sulfur Colloid Lymphoscintigraphy and Sentinel Node Localization in Breast Cancer Patients J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2006; 47(7): 1202 - 1208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Kizu, T. Takayama, M. Fukuda, M. Egawa, H. Tsushima, M. Yamada, K. Ichiyanagi, K. Yokoyama, M. Onoguchi, and N. Tonami Fusion of SPECT and Multidetector CT Images for Accurate Localization of Pelvic Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Prostate Cancer Patients J. Nucl. Med. Technol., June 1, 2005; 33(2): 78 - 82. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S H Kim, J Shim, C K Kim, J Machac, and B R Krynyckyi Reverse echelon node and a lymphatic ectasia in the same patient during breast lymphoscintigraphy: the importance of injection and imaging technique Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2004; 77(924): 1053 - 1056. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Ueda, K. Suga, Y. Kaneda, H. Sakano, T. Tanaka, M. Hayashi, T.-S. Li, and K. Hamano Radioisotope lymph node mapping in nonsmall cell lung cancer: can it be applicable for sentinel node biopsy? Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2004; 77(2): 426 - 430. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Law, K C Cheng, P M Wu, W Y Ho, and L W C Chow Patient effective dose from sentinel lymph node lymphoscintigraphy in breast cancer: a study using a female humanoid phantom and thermoluminescent dosemeters Br. J. Radiol., November 1, 2003; 76(911): 818 - 823. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Liberman Lymphoscintigraphy for Lymphatic Mapping in Breast Carcinoma Radiology, August 1, 2003; 228(2): 313 - 315. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. C. Solorzano, M. I. Ross, E. Delpassand, N. Mirza, J. S. Akins, H. M. Kuerer, F. Meric, F. C. Ames, L. Newman, B. Feig, et al. Utility of Breast Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Using Day-Before-Surgery Injection of High-Dose 99mTc-Labeled Sulfur Colloid Ann. Surg. Oncol., December 1, 2001; 8(10): 821 - 827. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. McCarter, H. Yeung, S. Yeh, J. Fey, P. I. Borgen, and H. S. Cody III Localization of the Sentinel Node in Breast Cancer: Identical Results With Same-Day and Day-Before Isotope Injection Ann. Surg. Oncol., September 1, 2001; 8(8): 682 - 686. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. C.G. Martin, J. Fey, H. Yeung, P. I. Borgen, and H. S. Cody III Highest Isotope Count Does Not Predict Sentinel Node Positivity in All Breast Cancer Patients Ann. Surg. Oncol., August 1, 2001; 8(7): 592 - 597. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Mariani, L. Moresco, G. Viale, G. Villa, M. Bagnasco, G. Canavese, J. Buscombe, H. W. Strauss, and G. Paganelli Radioguided Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer Surgery J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2001; 42(8): 1198 - 1215. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY | THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE |