HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hartmann, I. J.C. Articles by Prins, M. H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hartmann, I. J.C. Articles by Prins, M. H.

Technegas Versus ^81mKr Ventilation–Perfusion Scintigraphy: A Comparative Study in Patients with Suspected Acute Pulmonary Embolism

Departments of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center, Utrecht; Departments of Pulmonary Medicine and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Center Universiteit, Amsterdam; and Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

^81mKr is widely used as a ventilation agent to diagnose pulmonary embolism (PE). However, ^81mKr is expensive, which limits its continuous availability. Technegas can be an alternative ventilation agent with the advantage of being less expensive and available daily. The aim of this study was to compare the value of technegas with that of ^81mKr in the detection of PE. Methods: Ninety-two consecutive patients (29 men; mean ± SD, 53 ± 17 y old) with at least one segmental perfusion defect (Hull criteria) were studied prospectively. Perfusion and ventilation (V/Q) lung scintigraphy with both technegas and ^81mKr were performed within 24 h on all patients. V/Q lung scan results were classified as high probability for PE (normal ventilation study) or nondiagnostic (abnormal ventilation study). All V/Q lung scans were read by two experienced nuclear physicians in consensus. For the intra- and interobserver variabilities, two experienced observers independently read the V/Q lung scans. Results: ^81mKr and technegas showed a good agreement (, 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53–0.82). However, technegas significantly increased the number of nondiagnostic V/Q lung scans (P = 0.035). In 15 patients, a discrepancy was found between ^81mKr and technegas. False-positive V/Q lung scan results occurred in 4 of 12 patients (33%) with ^81mKr and in 2 of 3 patients (66%) with technegas. The intra- and interobserver variabilities were 0.71–0.88 (95% CI, 0.56–1.0) for perfusion/^81mKr and 0.74–0.96 (95% CI, 0.58–1.0) for perfusion/technegas. Conclusion: In comparison with ^81mKr, technegas does not result in more false-positive V/Q lung scan results. The use of technegas, however, increases the number of nondiagnostic V/Q lung scan results, which would increase the demand for further additional testing to confirm or refute PE.

Key Words: ventilation–perfusion lung scintigraphy • pulmonary embolism • technegas • ^81mKr

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. D. Stein, L. M. Freeman, H. D. Sostman, L. R. Goodman, P. K. Woodard, D. P. Naidich, A. Gottschalk, D. L. Bailey, F. Matta, A. Y. Yaekoub, et al. SPECT in Acute Pulmonary Embolism J. Nucl. Med., December 1, 2009; 50(12): 1999 - 2007. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Reinartz, H.-J. Kaiser, J. E. Wildberger, C. Gordji, B. Nowak, and U. Buell SPECT Imaging in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism: Automated Detection of Match and Mismatch Defects by Means of Image-Processing Techniques J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2006; 47(6): 968 - 973. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Reinartz, J. E. Wildberger, W. Schaefer, B. Nowak, A. H. Mahnken, and U. Buell Tomographic Imaging in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism: A Comparison Between V/Q Lung Scintigraphy in SPECT Technique and Multislice Spiral CT J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2004; 45(9): 1501 - 1508. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Reinartz, B. Nowak, C. Weiss, U. Buell, E. Coche, V. Roelants, A. Keyeux, F. Verschuren, and F. Zech Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Thin-Collimation Spiral CT versus Planar Ventilation-Perfusion Scintigraphy * Dr Coche and colleagues respond: Radiology, August 1, 2004; 232(2): 621 - 622. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Petersson, A. Sanchez-Crespo, M. Rohdin, S. Montmerle, S. Nyren, H. Jacobsson, S. A. Larsson, S. G. E. Lindahl, D. Linnarsson, R. W. Glenny, et al. Physiological evaluation of a new quantitative SPECT method measuring regional ventilation and perfusion J Appl Physiol, March 1, 2004; 96(3): 1127 - 1136. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]