JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alonso, O.
Right arrow Articles by Shankar, U. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alonso, O.
Right arrow Articles by Shankar, U. R.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 42 No. 11 1614-1621
© 2001 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


Clinical Investigations

Is 99mTc-Sestamibi Scintimammography Complementary to Conventional Mammography for Detecting Breast Cancer in Patients with Palpable Masses?

Omar Alonso, Teresa Massardo, Lucía B. Delgado, Jorge Horvath, Levent Kabasakal, Augusto Llamas-Olier, Khamza K. Maunda, Rosanna Morales, Ajit K. Padhy and Uma Ravi Shankar

Nuclear Medicine Center, Medical Oncology Department, Medicine Department, and Mammography Unit of Radiology Department, University of Uruguay, Montevideo, Uruguay; Nuclear Medicine Center, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile; Nuclear Medicine Department, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey; Nuclear Medicine Department, National Cancer Institute, Bogotá, Colombia; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ocean Road Cancer Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania; Nuclear Medicine Department, Peruvian Institute of Nuclear Energy, Lima, Peru; Nuclear Medicine Section, Department of Human Health, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria; and Nuclear Medicine Department, Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals, New Delhi, India

The aim of this trial was to evaluate in developing countries from different regions the diagnostic performance of 99mTc-sestamibi scintimammography (SM) in palpable breast lesions and to verify the clinical usefulness of a joint evaluation with mammography and SM. Methods: From 10 countries, a total of 238 patients with palpable breast masses (n = 245) were included in this prospective multicenter trial. Prone SM was performed 10 min and 60–90 min (157 patients) after injection using an isotime acquisition of 10 min. Mammography was assessed by the same dedicated imaging radiologist according to breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) categories for malignancy and breast density. Masked SM findings and mammography findings were checked for a correlation with histopathology findings for excisional biopsy samples. Diagnostic values for breast cancer detection were calculated per lesion. Results: Histopathology revealed 189 cancerous lesions and 56 benign lesions. The sensitivity and specificity of SM were 0.83 and 0.77, respectively. SM diagnostic values did not depend on the incidence of breast cancer in the country of origin or on the timing of imaging (early vs. delayed scans). On mammography, the technique yielded a sensitivity and specificity of 0.85 and 0.66, with 27 mammograms classified as BI-RADS category 1, 33 as category 2, 5 as category 3, 56 as category 4, and 124 as category 5. Thirty-seven lesions were considered to show increased radiologic density. No significant difference was found in SM diagnostic values among different BI-RADS categories or between the groups with low and high breast density. A sensitivity of 96% was calculated when SM and mammography results were combined, with 75% of all false-negative mammography findings classified as true-positive results by SM. Conclusion: SM complements mammography in patients with palpable masses and negative mammography findings.

Key Words: 99mTc-sestamibi • scintimammography • breast cancer




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
I. Mathieu, S. Mazy, B. Willemart, M. Destine, G. Mazy, and M. Lonneux
Inconclusive Triple Diagnosis in Breast Cancer Imaging: Is There a Place for Scintimammography?
J. Nucl. Med., October 1, 2005; 46(10): 1574 - 1581.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
O. Alonso, M. Martinez, L. Delgado, A. De Leon, D. De Boni, G. Lago, M. Garces, F. Fontes, J. Espasandin, and J. Priario
Staging of Regional Lymph Nodes in Melanoma Patients by Means of 99mTc-MIBI Scintigraphy
J. Nucl. Med., October 1, 2003; 44(10): 1561 - 1565.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
T. Massardo, O. Alonso, L. Kabasakal, A. Llamas-Olier, U. R. Shankar, H. Zhu, L. Delgado, P. Gonzalez, F. Mut, and A. K. Padhy
Diagnostic Value of 99mTc-Methylene Diphosphonate and 99mTc-Pentavalent DMSA Compared with 99mTc-Sestamibi for Palpable Breast Lesions
J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2002; 43(7): 882 - 888.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2001 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.