JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wen, X.
Right arrow Articles by Li, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wen, X.
Right arrow Articles by Li, C.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 42 No. 10 1530-1537
© 2001 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


Basic Science Investigations

Conjugation with 111In-DTPA-Poly(Ethylene Glycol) Improves Imaging of Anti-EGF Receptor Antibody C225

Xiaoxia Wen, Qing-Ping Wu, Shi Ke, Lee Ellis, Chusilp Charnsangavej, Abraham S. Delpassand, Sidney Wallace and Chun Li

Division of Diagnostic Imaging and Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas

Significant liver uptake often limits the clinical application of radiolabeled antibodies in radioimmunodetection. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the {gamma}-imaging properties of an antiepidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody, C225, conjugated with heterofunctional poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) with 1 terminus of the polymer attached to a radiometal chelator, diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA). Methods: Two preparations of PEG-modified C225, one with 20% and the other with 60% amine substitution, were labeled with 111In. The conjugates, 111In-DTPA-PEG-C225, were injected intravenously into nude mice with EGFR-positive A431 tumors. For comparison, C225 directly labeled with 111In was also injected. In a competitive study, mice with A431 tumors were pretreated intravenously with 100-fold excess of native C225, followed by an injection of 111In-DTPA-PEG-C225 30 min or 20 h later. In addition, 111In-DTPA-PEG-C225 was injected into mice with EGFR-positive MDA-MB-468 tumors and EGFR-negative MDA-MB-435 tumors. Images were acquired at 5 min and at 2, 6, 24, and 48 h after injection of the radiotracers. Regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn on the computer images around the whole body, liver, muscle, and tumor. The counts per pixel in the tumor and normal tissues were calculated. At 48 h, the mice were killed and dissected. Blood, liver, muscle, and tumor samples were removed and the radioactivity of each sample was measured. Results: In A431 tumor xenografts, the tumor uptake of C225 modified with PEG was not significantly different than the uptake of unmodified 111In-DTPA-C225. Uptake in the liver, however, was reduced by 38%–45%, and the reduction increased with increasing degree of PEG substitution. Tumors of A431 and MDA-MB-468 xenografts were clearly visualized with 111In-DTPA-PEG-C225, whereas tumors of the MDA-MB-435 xenograft, which expresses low levels of EGFR, were not as readily visible. The tumor-to-blood ratios of 111In-DTPA-PEG-C225 in A431 and MDA-MB-468 xenografts were about 3 fold higher than in MDA-MB-435 xenografts. Blocking EGFR by pretreatment with native C225 significantly reduced the uptake of 111In-DTPA-PEG-C225 in the liver. The tumor-to-blood ratios in mice with A431 tumors were decreased 2.5–2.7 fold after pretreatment with a large excess of C225. Similar results were obtained with MDA-MB-468 tumor xenografts. In contrast, the tumor-to-blood ratios in mice with MDA-MB-435 tumor xenografts were not significantly different in C225-pretreated mice than in nonpretreated mice. Conclusion: These findings indicate that 111In-DTPA-PEG-C225 selectively localized to the tumors expressing high levels of EGFR. PEG-modification of C225 significantly reduced its liver uptake, resulting in improved visualization of EGFR-positive tumors. Using PEG as a linker between the monoclonal antibody and metal chelator is a useful strategy to optimize the imaging characteristics of antibody-based scintigraphic agents.

Key Words: epidermal growth factor receptor • monoclonal antibody C225 • 111In • imaging




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
L. O. T. Gainkam, L. Huang, V. Caveliers, M. Keyaerts, S. Hernot, I. Vaneycken, C. Vanhove, H. Revets, P. De Baetselier, and T. Lahoutte
Comparison of the Biodistribution and Tumor Targeting of Two 99mTc-Labeled Anti-EGFR Nanobodies in Mice, Using Pinhole SPECT/Micro-CT
J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2008; 49(5): 788 - 795.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
P. Diagaradjane, J. M. Orenstein-Cardona, N. E. Colon-Casasnovas, A. Deorukhkar, S. Shentu, N. Kuno, D. L. Schwartz, J. G. Gelovani, and S. Krishnan
Imaging Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Expression In vivo: Pharmacokinetic and Biodistribution Characterization of a Bioconjugated Quantum Dot Nanoprobe
Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2008; 14(3): 731 - 741.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
B. Van Den Bossche and C. Van de Wiele
Receptor Imaging in Oncology by Means of Nuclear Medicine: Current Status
J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2004; 22(17): 3593 - 3607.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
S. Ke, X. Wen, M. Gurfinkel, C. Charnsangavej, S. Wallace, E. M. Sevick-Muraca, and C. Li
Near-Infrared Optical Imaging of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor in Breast Cancer Xenografts
Cancer Res., November 15, 2003; 63(22): 7870 - 7875.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
S. J. DeNardo, Z. Yao, K. S. Lam, A. Song, P. A. Burke, G. R. Mirick, K. R. Lamborn, R. T. O'Donnell, and G. L. DeNardo
Effect of Molecular Size of Pegylated Peptide on the Pharmacokinetics and Tumor Targeting in Lymphoma-Bearing Mice
Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 2003; 9(10): 3854S - 3864.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2001 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.