JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Higashi, K.
Right arrow Articles by Yamamoto, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Higashi, K.
Right arrow Articles by Yamamoto, I.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 42 No. 10 1489-1496
© 2001 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


Clinical Investigations

Comparison of [18F]FDG PET and 201Tl SPECT in Evaluation of Pulmonary Nodules

Kotaro Higashi, Yoshimichi Ueda, Tsutomu Sakuma, Hiroyasu Seki, Manabu Oguchi, Mitsuru Taniguchi, Suzuka Taki, Hisao Tonami, Shogo Katsuda and Itaru Yamamoto

Departments of Radiology, Pathology, and Thoracic Surgery, Kanazawa Medical University, Kanazawa; and Department of Radiology, Kanazawa Cardiovascular Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan

Recent reports have indicated the value of [18F]FDG PET and 201Tl SPECT in diagnosing lung cancer. In this study, we compared the diagnostic value of FDG PET and 201Tl SPECT in the evaluation of pulmonary nodules. Methods: Sixty-three patients with 66 pulmonary nodules suspected to be lung cancer on the basis of chest CT were examined by FDG PET and 201Tl SPECT (early and delayed scans) within a week of each study. For semiquantitative analysis, the standardized uptake value (SUV) or the tumor-to-nontumor activity ratio (T/N) (or both) was calculated. All of these lesions were completely removed thoracoscopically or by thoracotomy and were examined histologically. Results: Fifty-four nodules were histologically confirmed to be malignant tumors, and 12 were benign. Both techniques delineated focal lesions with an increase in tracer accumulation in 41 of 54 lung cancers. 201Tl SPECT on early or delayed scans (or both) identified 4 additional lung cancers that FDG PET images did not reveal: 3 bronchioloalveolar carcinomas and a well-differentiated adenocarcinoma. FDG PET identified 3 additional lung cancers that 201Tl SPECT images did not reveal; 2 of these lung cancers were <2 cm in diameter. The mean FDG SUV and T/N of bronchioloalveolar carcinomas (2.06 ± 0.76 and 3.49 ± 1.03, respectively) were significantly lower than those of poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas (5.55 ± 2.01 [P = 0.026] and 8.23 ± 2.16 [P = 0.01], respectively). However, no significant difference was found in 201Tl T/N on early and delayed scans between bronchioloalveolar carcinomas (1.64 ± 0.29 and 1.87 ± 0.42, respectively) and poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas (1.58 ± 0.32 and 2.76 ± 1.36, respectively). Of the 12 benign nodules, FDG PET and 201Tl SPECT showed false-positive results for the same 7 benign nodules (58.3%) (4 granulomas, 1 sarcoidosis, 1 inflammatory pseudotumor, and 1 aspergilloma). Negative FDG PET findings and positive 201Tl SPECT findings were obtained only for bronchioloalveolar carcinomas or a well-differentiated adenocarcinoma but not for other histologic types of lung cancers or benign pulmonary nodules. Conclusion: No significant difference was found between FDG PET and 201Tl SPECT in specificity for the differentiation of malignant and benign pulmonary nodules. The degree of differentiation of lung adenocarcinoma correlated with FDG uptake but not with 201Tl uptake. Bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (a well-differentiated, slow-growing tumor) findings typically were positive with 201Tl but were negative with FDG. The combination of FDG PET and 201Tl SPECT may provide additional information regarding the tissue characterization of pulmonary nodules.

Key Words: PET • lung cancer • 201Tl • [18F]FDG




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
P. Cronin, B. A. Dwamena, A. M. Kelly, and R. C. Carlos
Solitary Pulmonary Nodules: Meta-analytic Comparison of Cross-sectional Imaging Modalities for Diagnosis of Malignancy
Radiology, March 1, 2008; 246(3): 772 - 782.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
Y. Demura, T. Tsuchida, T. Ishizaki, S. Mizuno, Y. Totani, S. Ameshima, I. Miyamori, M. Sasaki, and Y. Yonekura
18F-FDG Accumulation with PET for Differentiation Between Benign and Malignant Lesions in the Thorax
J. Nucl. Med., April 1, 2003; 44(4): 540 - 548.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
K. Kubota
Changing Pattern of Lung Cancer and Its Imaging: 201Tl SPECT Versus [18F]FDG PET
J. Nucl. Med., October 1, 2001; 42(10): 1497 - 1498.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2001 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.