JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Itoh, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Itoh, K.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 42 No. 10 1484-1488
© 2001 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


Clinical Investigations

Determination of Glomerular Filtration Rate by Means of Newly Developed Plastic Scintillation Counter Both With and Without Dilution Procedures

Kazuo Itoh

Department of Radiology, JR Sapporo General Hospital, Sapporo, Japan

The double-well single-plastic scintillation counter (DW counter) has been developed to reduce the need for technical expertise in a plasma sample method after a single injection of radioactive marker. The DW counter serves the 2 functions of a standard well counter in well A and a dose calibrator in well B. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical feasibility of the counter for the estimation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) with 99mTc-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA). Methods: The study was performed on 25 patients with varying degrees of renal dysfunction. The GFR was estimated by a single-sample method after a single injection of 99mTc-DTPA. Total injected dose and plasma radioactivity were calculated following 2 methods: standard dilution with a single well (dilution method) and no dilution with 2 wells (direct method). Results: The GFR directly estimated by the DW counter correlated excellently with the GFR estimated by the dilution method (r = 0.998; root mean square error = 2.01 mL/min/1.73 m2). The 95% of differences (-0.3124 to 0.0423 percentage injected dose [%ID]/L/1.73 m2) in plasma concentration between the 2 comparative methods was <2 SDs. The direct method tended to give slightly higher readings of plasma concentration than did the dilution method (95% confidence interval = -0.0364 to -0.0904 %ID/L/1.73 m2). Conclusion: The DW counter can circumvent laborious dilution techniques and expertise required for quantifying the GFR in a single-sample method after a single injection of 99mTc-DTPA in clinical practice. It is proposed as an alternative to the standard dilution method.

Key Words: plastic scintillation counter • plasma sample method • glomerular filtration rate • 99mTc-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2001 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.