|
|
||||||||
CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS |
Division of Nuclear Medicine and Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Leuven Hospital, Leuven, Belgium
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using 18F-FDG and PET for the detection of infection associated with lower limb arthroplasty. Methods: Seventy-four prostheses in 62 patients in whom infection was suspected after artificial hip or knee placement were studied with this technique. Images were obtained 60 min after an intravenous injection of FDG. The images were interpreted as positive for infection if tracer uptake was increased at the boneprosthesis interface. A final diagnosis was made by surgical exploration or clinical follow-up for 1 y. PET results were compared with the follow-up outcome in all patients. Results: The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of PET for detecting infection associated with knee prostheses were 90.9%, 72.0%, and 77.8%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of PET for detecting infection associated with hip prostheses were 90%, 89.3%, and 89.5%, respectively. Overall, the sensitivity was 90.5% and the specificity was 81.1% for detection of lower limb infections. Conclusion: FDG PET is a useful imaging modality for detecting infections associated with lower limb arthroplasty and is more accurate for detecting infections associated with hip prostheses than for detecting infections associated with knee prostheses.
Key Words: 18F-FDG PET infection arthroplasty
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Kumar, S. Basu, D. Torigian, V. Anand, H. Zhuang, and A. Alavi Role of Modern Imaging Techniques for Diagnosis of Infection in the Era of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Clin. Microbiol. Rev., January 1, 2008; 21(1): 209 - 224. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H Marmery and S Ostlere Imaging of prosthetic joints Imaging, September 1, 2007; 19(3): 299 - 309. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Burroni, C. D'Alessandria, and A. Signore Diagnosis of Vascular Prosthesis Infection: PET or SPECT? J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2007; 48(8): 1227 - 1229. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Keidar, A. Engel, A. Hoffman, O. Israel, and S. Nitecki Prosthetic Vascular Graft Infection: The Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2007; 48(8): 1230 - 1236. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. E. Pakos, T. A. Trikalinos, A. D. Fotopoulos, and J. P. A. Ioannidis Prosthesis Infection: Diagnosis after Total Joint Arthroplasty with Antigranulocyte Scintigraphy with 99mTc-labeled Monoclonal Antibodies--A Meta-Analysis Radiology, December 1, 2006; 242(1): 101 - 108. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. W. Bauer, J. Parvizi, N. Kobayashi, and V. Krebs Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Infection J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 2006; 88(4): 869 - 882. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Love, M. B. Tomas, G. G. Tronco, and C. J. Palestro FDG PET of Infection and Inflammation RadioGraphics, September 1, 2005; 25(5): 1357 - 1368. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Reinartz, T. Mumme, B. Hermanns, U. Cremerius, D. C. Wirtz, W. M. Schaefer, F.-U. Niethard, and U. Buell Radionuclide imaging of the painful hip arthroplasty: POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY VERSUS TRIPLE-PHASE BONE SCANNING J Bone Joint Surg Br, April 1, 2005; 87-B(4): 465 - 470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Keidar, D. Militianu, E. Melamed, R. Bar-Shalom, and O. Israel The Diabetic Foot: Initial Experience with 18F-FDG PET/CT J. Nucl. Med., March 1, 2005; 46(3): 444 - 449. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Love, S. E. Marwin, M. B. Tomas, E. S. Krauss, G. G. Tronco, K. K. Bhargava, K. J. Nichols, and C. J. Palestro Diagnosing Infection in the Failed Joint Replacement: A Comparison of Coincidence Detection 18F-FDG and 111In-Labeled Leukocyte/99mTc-Sulfur Colloid Marrow Imaging J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2004; 45(11): 1864 - 1871. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Love and C. J. Palestro Radionuclide Imaging of Infection J. Nucl. Med. Technol., June 1, 2004; 32(2): 47 - 57. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. D. M. Stumpe, H. P. Notzli, M. Zanetti, E. M. Kamel, T. F. Hany, G. W. Gorres, G. K. von Schulthess, and J. Hodler FDG PET for Differentiation of Infection and Aseptic Loosening in Total Hip Replacements: Comparison with Conventional Radiography and Three-Phase Bone Scintigraphy Radiology, May 1, 2004; 231(2): 333 - 341. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. B. Crymes Jr, H. Demos, and L. Gordon Detection of Musculoskeletal Infection with 18F-FDG PET: Review of the Current Literature J. Nucl. Med. Technol., March 1, 2004; 32(1): 12 - 15. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S Ostlere and S Soin Imaging of prosthetic joints Imaging, December 1, 2003; 15(4): 270 - 285. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Palestro Nuclear Medicine, the Painful Prosthetic Joint, and Orthopedic Infection J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2003; 44(6): 927 - 929. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. W. Goerres, S. I. Ziegler, C. Burger, T. Berthold, G. K. von Schulthess, and A. Buck Artifacts at PET and PET/CT Caused by Metallic Hip Prosthetic Material Radiology, February 1, 2003; 226(2): 577 - 584. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Love, M. B. Tomas, S. E. Marwin, P. V. Pugliese, and C. J. Palestro Role of Nuclear Medicine in Diagnosis of the Infected Joint Replacement RadioGraphics, September 1, 2001; 21(5): 1229 - 1238. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY | THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE |