JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhuang, H.
Right arrow Articles by Alavi, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhuang, H.
Right arrow Articles by Alavi, A.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 42 No. 1 44-48
© 2001 by Society of Nuclear Medicine


CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS

The Promising Role of 18F-FDG PET in Detecting Infected Lower Limb Prosthesis Implants

Hongming Zhuang, Paulo S. Duarte, Michael Pourdehnad, Alex Maes, Frank Van Acker, Darryl Shnier, Jonathan P. Garino, Robert H. Fitzgerald and Abass Alavi

Division of Nuclear Medicine and Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Leuven Hospital, Leuven, Belgium

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using 18F-FDG and PET for the detection of infection associated with lower limb arthroplasty. Methods: Seventy-four prostheses in 62 patients in whom infection was suspected after artificial hip or knee placement were studied with this technique. Images were obtained 60 min after an intravenous injection of FDG. The images were interpreted as positive for infection if tracer uptake was increased at the bone–prosthesis interface. A final diagnosis was made by surgical exploration or clinical follow-up for 1 y. PET results were compared with the follow-up outcome in all patients. Results: The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of PET for detecting infection associated with knee prostheses were 90.9%, 72.0%, and 77.8%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of PET for detecting infection associated with hip prostheses were 90%, 89.3%, and 89.5%, respectively. Overall, the sensitivity was 90.5% and the specificity was 81.1% for detection of lower limb infections. Conclusion: FDG PET is a useful imaging modality for detecting infections associated with lower limb arthroplasty and is more accurate for detecting infections associated with hip prostheses than for detecting infections associated with knee prostheses.

Key Words: 18F-FDG PET • infection • arthroplasty




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.Home page
R. Kumar, S. Basu, D. Torigian, V. Anand, H. Zhuang, and A. Alavi
Role of Modern Imaging Techniques for Diagnosis of Infection in the Era of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography
Clin. Microbiol. Rev., January 1, 2008; 21(1): 209 - 224.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
H Marmery and S Ostlere
Imaging of prosthetic joints
Imaging, September 1, 2007; 19(3): 299 - 309.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
L. Burroni, C. D'Alessandria, and A. Signore
Diagnosis of Vascular Prosthesis Infection: PET or SPECT?
J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2007; 48(8): 1227 - 1229.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
Z. Keidar, A. Engel, A. Hoffman, O. Israel, and S. Nitecki
Prosthetic Vascular Graft Infection: The Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT
J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2007; 48(8): 1230 - 1236.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. E. Pakos, T. A. Trikalinos, A. D. Fotopoulos, and J. P. A. Ioannidis
Prosthesis Infection: Diagnosis after Total Joint Arthroplasty with Antigranulocyte Scintigraphy with 99mTc-labeled Monoclonal Antibodies--A Meta-Analysis
Radiology, December 1, 2006; 242(1): 101 - 108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
T. W. Bauer, J. Parvizi, N. Kobayashi, and V. Krebs
Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Infection
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 2006; 88(4): 869 - 882.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
C. Love, M. B. Tomas, G. G. Tronco, and C. J. Palestro
FDG PET of Infection and Inflammation
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2005; 25(5): 1357 - 1368.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
P. Reinartz, T. Mumme, B. Hermanns, U. Cremerius, D. C. Wirtz, W. M. Schaefer, F.-U. Niethard, and U. Buell
Radionuclide imaging of the painful hip arthroplasty: POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY VERSUS TRIPLE-PHASE BONE SCANNING
J Bone Joint Surg Br, April 1, 2005; 87-B(4): 465 - 470.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
Z. Keidar, D. Militianu, E. Melamed, R. Bar-Shalom, and O. Israel
The Diabetic Foot: Initial Experience with 18F-FDG PET/CT
J. Nucl. Med., March 1, 2005; 46(3): 444 - 449.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
C. Love, S. E. Marwin, M. B. Tomas, E. S. Krauss, G. G. Tronco, K. K. Bhargava, K. J. Nichols, and C. J. Palestro
Diagnosing Infection in the Failed Joint Replacement: A Comparison of Coincidence Detection 18F-FDG and 111In-Labeled Leukocyte/99mTc-Sulfur Colloid Marrow Imaging
J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2004; 45(11): 1864 - 1871.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nucl. Med. Technol.Home page
C. Love and C. J. Palestro
Radionuclide Imaging of Infection
J. Nucl. Med. Technol., June 1, 2004; 32(2): 47 - 57.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. D. M. Stumpe, H. P. Notzli, M. Zanetti, E. M. Kamel, T. F. Hany, G. W. Gorres, G. K. von Schulthess, and J. Hodler
FDG PET for Differentiation of Infection and Aseptic Loosening in Total Hip Replacements: Comparison with Conventional Radiography and Three-Phase Bone Scintigraphy
Radiology, May 1, 2004; 231(2): 333 - 341.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nucl. Med. Technol.Home page
W. B. Crymes Jr, H. Demos, and L. Gordon
Detection of Musculoskeletal Infection with 18F-FDG PET: Review of the Current Literature
J. Nucl. Med. Technol., March 1, 2004; 32(1): 12 - 15.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
S Ostlere and S Soin
Imaging of prosthetic joints
Imaging, December 1, 2003; 15(4): 270 - 285.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
C. J. Palestro
Nuclear Medicine, the Painful Prosthetic Joint, and Orthopedic Infection
J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2003; 44(6): 927 - 929.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. W. Goerres, S. I. Ziegler, C. Burger, T. Berthold, G. K. von Schulthess, and A. Buck
Artifacts at PET and PET/CT Caused by Metallic Hip Prosthetic Material
Radiology, February 1, 2003; 226(2): 577 - 584.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
C. Love, M. B. Tomas, S. E. Marwin, P. V. Pugliese, and C. J. Palestro
Role of Nuclear Medicine in Diagnosis of the Infected Joint Replacement
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2001; 21(5): 1229 - 1238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2001 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.