|
|
||||||||
Departments of Diagnostic Radiology, Psychiatry, and Pharmacology, Yale University School of Medicine, and VA Connecticut, West Haven, Connecticut
Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Andrea Varrone, MD, VA Medical Center, 116 A2, 950 Campbell Ave., West Haven, CT 06516.
ABSTRACT
This study evaluated the test-retest reproducibility of D2 receptor quantification in the thalamus and temporal cortex using [123I]epidepride SPECT. Methods: Ten healthy volunteers (4 men, 6 women; age range, 1946 y) underwent 2 SPECT studies (interval, 226 d) using a bolus-plus-constant-infusion paradigm (bolus-to-infusion ratio = 6 h; infusion time = 9 h). Plasma clearance (in liters per hour) and free fraction (f1) of the parent tracer were measured. Radioactivity (in becquerels per gram) in the thalamus, temporal cortex, and cerebellum were normalized to the infusion rate (in becquerels per hour). Normalized striatal radioactivity was also measured to assess reproducibility in regions with a high density of receptors and better counting statistics. The outcome measures obtained were V3 (receptor density [Bmax/equilibrium dissociation constant [KD]), V3' (f1 x Bmax/KD), and RT (specific-to-nondisplaceable tissue ratio). Results: Test-retest variability and reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient) were 10.8% and 0.88, respectively, for plasma clearance and 15.3% and 0.77, respectively, for f1. The test-retest variability of brain-specific (target minus nondisplaceable) radioactivity was higher in the thalamus and temporal cortex than in the striatum, although reliability was comparable. Among the outcome measures, V3' showed better test-retest variability and reliability in the thalamus (13.3% and 0.75, respectively) and temporal cortex (13.4% and 0.86, respectively). Conclusion: Brain radioactivity was the main source of variability for quantification of extrastriatal D2 receptors with [123I]epidepride. The reproducibility of outcome measures in extrastriatal regions was good. However, because receptor density was lower in extrastriatal regions than in the striatum, the counting statistics in these regions were low and reproducibility was affected by the higher test-retest variability of brain-specific radioactivity. Compared with V3 and V3', RT showed less test-retest variability in the thalamus and temporal cortex but lower reliability. Moreover, measurement of RT may be affected by the presence of potential lipophilic metabolites entering the brain.
Key Words: [123I]epidepride dopaminergic system reproducibility D2 receptor quantification
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. A. Norbury, A. J. MacGregor, J. Urwin, T. D. Spector, and S. B. McMahon Heritability of responses to painful stimuli in women: a classical twin study Brain, November 1, 2007; 130(11): 3041 - 3049. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Catafau, M. Danus, S. Bullich, J. Llop, J. Perich, V. J. Cunningham, P. Plaza, M. M. Penengo, J. L.H. Eersels, L. Squassante, et al. Characterization of the SPECT 5-HT2A Receptor Ligand 123I-R91150 in Healthy Volunteers: Part 1--Pseudoequilibrium Interval and Quantification Methods J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2006; 47(6): 919 - 928. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. K. Staley, C. H. van Dyck, D. Weinzimmer, E. Brenner, R. M. Baldwin, G. D. Tamagnan, P. Riccardi, E. Mitsis, and J. P. Seibyl 123I-5-IA-85380 SPECT Measurement of Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors in Human Brain by the Constant Infusion Paradigm: Feasibility and Reproducibility J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2005; 46(9): 1466 - 1472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Catafau, V. Perez, M. M. Penengo, S. Bullich, M. Danus, D. Puigdemont, J. C. Pascual, I. Corripio, J. Llop, J. Perich, et al. SPECT of Serotonin Transporters Using 123I-ADAM: Optimal Imaging Time After Bolus Injection and Long-Term Test-Retest in Healthy Volunteers J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2005; 46(8): 1301 - 1309. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Duncan Seizure-induced neuronal injury: Human data Neurology, November 12, 2002; 59(90095): S15 - 20. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY | THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE |