JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 41 No. 4 596-599
© 2000 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lin, E.
Right arrow Articles by Treves, S. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lin, E.
Right arrow Articles by Treves, S. T.

Effect of Early Emptying on Quantitation and Interpretation of Liquid Gastric Emptying Studies of Infants and Young Children

Eva Lin, Leonard P. Connolly, Laura Drubach, David Zurakowski, James DiCanzio, Karl Mitchell and S. Ted Treves

Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Leonard P. Connolly, MD, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Ave., Boston, MA.

ABSTRACT

This study assesses the effect of emptying that occurs during feeding on quantitation and interpretation of liquid gastric emptying studies of infants and young children. Methods: Forty-nine 99mTc-sulfur colloid liquid gastric emptying studies of 44 children (22 boys, 22 girls; mean age, 20 mo; age range, 2–46 mo) fed orally or by gastrostomy tubes were evaluated. Gastric residuals quantitated by 2 commonly used methods, the first of which does not account for early emptying and the second of which does, were compared. With the first method, residual relative to activity in the stomach at the start of imaging (Rg) was quantified by comparing activity in a region of interest (ROI) drawn about the stomach on the final image to activity in an ROI drawn about only the stomach at the start of imaging. With the second method, residual relative to total dose (Rt) was quantified by comparing activity in the same final ROI to activity in an ROI that included stomach and small bowel at the start of imaging. Studies were interpreted independently for Rg and Rt considering a value >70% as evidence of delayed emptying. Results: Rt was lower than Rg by 15%–16% for the entire population, for patients fed orally, and for patients fed by gastrostomy tube. These differences reached statistical significance (P < 0.0001). In 31 of 49 studies, Rt was lower than Rg by a 10%. In 8 studies, emptying classified as delayed on the basis of Rg was classified as nondelayed on the basis of Rt. Clinical decisions based on Rt did not require later management changes that would have indicated that treatment of gastric dysmotility had been postponed in any patient. Conclusion: Emptying that occurs during feeding should be factored into quantitation of liquid gastric emptying in infants and young children. Not recognizing and accounting for early emptying results in overestimated gastric residuals and can lead to classification of emptying as delayed in children whose residuals of the total administered dose are within a recognized range of normal.

Key Words: gastric emptying • children







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2000 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.