JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 41 No. 3 426-428
© 2000 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Obwegeser, R.
Right arrow Articles by Sinzinger, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Obwegeser, R.
Right arrow Articles by Sinzinger, H.

Use of 99mTc-Furifosmin Scintigraphy—Planar and SPECT—to Evaluate Suggestive Palpable and Nonpalpable Breast Lesions

Reinhard Obwegeser, Peter Berghammer, Margarida Rodrigues, Ernst Kubista and Helmut Sinzinger

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Vienna, Austria

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Reinhard Obwegeser, MD, Division of Special Gynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.

ABSTRACT

Our objective was to evaluate the role of 99mTc-furifosmin scintigraphy—planar and SPECT—in discriminating benign from malignant breast disease. Methods: The trial was prospective, open, and diagnostic. We recruited 30 consecutive patients with 14 palpable and 16 nonpalpable breast lesions. After receiving informed consent, we injected 555–640 MBq 99mTc-furifosmin intravenously in the arm contralateral to the breast lesion. Planar imaging and SPECT were performed. All patients underwent excision of the tumor within 2 wk. Using histology as the gold standard, we calculated sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for 99mTc-furifosmin in planar and SPECT technique. Results: For 18 malignant and 12 benign breast lesions, a sensitivity of 50% for planar imaging and 72% for SPECT was seen. Specificity and positive and negative predictive values were 83%, 82%, and 53%, respectively, for planar imaging and 50%, 68%, and 55%, respectively, for SPECT. For the 14 palpable tumors (10 malignant, 4 benign), which averaged 17 ± 10 mm in size (size range, 4–45 mm), a sensitivity of 60% for planar imaging and 80% for SPECT was achieved. Sixteen lesions were not palpable (median size, 9 ± 3 mm [size range, 4–13 mm]). In this subgroup, 99mTc-furifosmin scintigraphy yielded a sensitivity of 37% for planar and 62% for SPECT technique (P > 0.05). Conclusion: 99mTc-furifosmin scintigraphy is not a potent competitor to established scintigraphic procedures. In comparing this tracer with 99mTc-sestamibi and 99mTc-tetrofosmin, we cannot recommend 99mTc-furifosmin for the diagnosis of breast cancer.

Key Words: 99mTc-furifosmin • breast cancer • scintimammography







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2000 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.