HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) CME Activity Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Fogelman, I. Articles by Blake, G. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Fogelman, I. Articles by Blake, G. M.

Different Approaches to Bone Densitometry*

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Guy's Hospital, London, United Kingdom

From 1990 to 2000, several effective new treatments were introduced for the prevention of osteoporotic fractures; these treatments were proven effective in large, international, clinical trials. At the same time, there was rapid technologic innovation, with the introduction of new radiologic methods for the noninvasive assessment of patients' bone density status. These developments led to the publication of guidelines for the clinical use of bone densitometry that include criteria for the referral of patients for investigation as well as recommendations for intervention thresholds for the initiation of preventive treatment of osteoporosis. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scanning of the spine and hip remains the technique of choice for bone densitometry studies, although there is now a wider appreciation of the need for smaller, cheaper devices for scanning the peripheral skeleton if the millions of women most at risk of a fragility fracture are to be identified and treated. This article reviews these developments, concentrating in particular on the advantages and disadvantages of the different types of equipment available for performing bone densitometry investigations, the guidelines for the referral of patients, and the principles for the interpretation of the scan findings.

Key Words: bone densitometry • osteoporosis • dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry • quantitative CT • quantitative ultrasound • radiographic absorptiometry

Received Jun. 15, 2000; revision accepted Aug. 8, 2000.

For correspondence or reprints contact: Ignac Fogelman, MD, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Guy's Hospital, St. Thomas St., London SE1 9RT, United Kingdom.

*NOTE: FOR CE CREDIT, YOU CAN ACCESS THIS ACTIVITY THROUGH THE SNM WEB SITE (http://www.snm.org) UNTIL JUNE 2001.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. A. Jankowska, J. Jakubaszko, A. Cwynar, J. Majda, B. Ponikowska, D. Kustrzycka-Kratochwil, K. Reczuch, L. Borodulin-Nadzieja, W. Banasiak, P. A. Poole-Wilson, et al. Bone mineral status and bone loss over time in men with chronic systolic heart failure and their clinical and hormonal determinants Eur J Heart Fail, January 1, 2009; 11(1): 28 - 38. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A A Fonseca, K Cherubini, E B Veeck, R S Ladeira, and L P Carapeto Effect of 10% formalin on radiographic optical density of bone specimens Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., March 1, 2008; 37(3): 137 - 141. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. M Blake and I. Fogelman The role of DXA bone density scans in the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis Postgrad. Med. J., August 1, 2007; 83(982): 509 - 517. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. J. Morton, D. Kritz-Silverstein, D. J. Riley, E. L. Barrett-Connor, and D. L. Wingard Premature Graying, Balding, and Low Bone Mineral Density in Older Women and Men: The Rancho Bernardo Study J Aging Health, April 1, 2007; 19(2): 275 - 285. [Abstract] [PDF]