JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 41 No. 12 1955-1963
© 2000 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sfakianakis, G. N.
Right arrow Articles by Strauss, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Sfakianakis, G. N.
Right arrow Articles by Strauss, J.

Diuretic MAG3 Scintigraphy (F0) in Acute Pyelonephritis: Regional Parenchymal Dysfunction and Comparison with DMSA

George N. Sfakianakis, Felipe Cavagnaro, Gaston Zilleruelo, Carolyn Abitbol, Brenda Montane, Mike Georgiou, Shabbir Ezuddin, William Mallin, Efrosyni Sfakianakis and Jose Strauss

Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology; Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics; and Department of Medicine, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida

99mTc-DMSA late static planar imaging or SPECT is being used for the investigation of focal acute pyelonephritis (APN), especially in children with urinary tract infection (UTI). Diuretic 99mTc-mercaptoacetyltriglycine (MAG3) dynamic scintirenography has been applied in the evaluation of kidney function and structure, frequently to exclude obstruction. However, in children and adults with a clinical picture of APN, diuretic MAG3 scintigraphy with zero time injection of furosemide (MAG3-F0) was observed to display focal parenchymal abnormalities; regional dysfunction (focal parenchymal decrease in early uptake; slow filling in and prolonged late retention of activity); or, less frequently, fixed defects. This observation was further studied both retrospectively and prospectively, and its sensitivity and specificity for APN were compared with those of dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA). Methods: In the retrospective study, for 36 children with UTI and regional parenchymal findings on MAG3-F0, data were reviewed, analyzed, and compared with the results of concurrent DMSA studies. In the prospective study, for 57 children with clinical and laboratory findings suggestive of APN, the 2 radiopharmaceuticals were used for imaging sequentially and the results of the 2 studies were compared. The criteria for abnormal findings compatible with the diagnosis of APN were, for MAG3-F0, regional parenchymal dysfunction and fixed focal defects and, for DMSA, focal defects without parenchymal loss. Results: In all groups of patients, most abnormal MAG3-F0 studies (80%) showed regional parenchymal dysfunction, but in some (20%) a fixed defect was found. Compared with DMSA and when both regional dysfunction and focal defects were considered, MAG3-F0 was as sensitive as DMSA. Some patients had only MAG3-F0 abnormalities, suggesting a slightly lower specificity for MAG3-F0 compared with DMSA (86%); this finding needs further study, because it also raises questions about the sensitivity of DMSA, considering that only a small percentage of patients with clinically suggestive findings had abnormal study findings. In most patients with fixed defects on both DMSA and MAG3-F0, follow-up studies showed no resolution, suggesting that a fixed defect on MAG3-F0 may indicate either more severe APN or preexistent scars and that regional dysfunction may be a sign more specific for APN and prognostic of potential recovery. In addition, a pattern more specific for a scar—a fixed defect with a dilated regional calyx—was seen on follow-up MAG3-F0. Conclusion: A fast (25-min) planar dynamic MAG3-F0 study was found to be as sensitive at depicting focal parenchymal abnormalities in APN as was the 3- to 4-h DMSA routine procedure. The sensitivity and specificity of both studies need further evaluation.

Key Words: acute pyelonephritis • scars • dimercaptosuccinic acid • mercaptoacetyltriglycine • furosemide renography

Received Sep. 22, 1999; revision accepted May 16, 2000.

For correspondence or reprints contact: George N. Sfakianakis, MD, Division of Nuclear Medicine (D-57), University of Miami School of Medicine, P.O. Box 016960, Miami, FL 33101.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
A. Imperiale, C. Olianti, S. Sestini, M. Materassi, S. Daniela, R. Ienuso, and G. La Cava
123I-Hippuran Renal Scintigraphy with Evaluation of Single-Kidney Clearance for Predicting Renal Scarring After Acute Urinary Tract Infection: Comparison with 99mTc-DMSA Scanning
J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2003; 44(11): 1755 - 1760.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2000 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.