JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 41 No. 11 1861-1867
© 2000 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME Activity
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Langleben, D. D.
Right arrow Articles by Segall, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Langleben, D. D.
Right arrow Articles by Segall, G. M.

PET in Differentiation of Recurrent Brain Tumor from Radiation Injury*

Daniel D. Langleben and George M. Segall

Nuclear Medicine Service, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, and Division of Nuclear Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California

The annual incidence of primary intracranial tumors is 7 to 19 cases per 100,000 people. The general approach to the treatment of brain neoplasms is surgical resection of solitary lesions or limited disease, followed by radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy. Multiple metastatic lesions are usually treated with whole-brain radiation. Radiation injury occurs in 5% to 37% of cases and can be difficult to differentiate from residual or recurrent malignancy by MRI. PET has been used to differentiate radiation injury from malignancy on the basis of differences in glucose uptake. Recent studies have reported the sensitivity and specificity of PET to be 81% to 86% and 40% to 94%, respectively. This article reviews the classification of primary brain tumors, the histologic changes associated with radiation injury, and the diagnostic and prognostic information provided by PET.

Key Words: PET • FDG • glioma • radiation injury • radiation necrosis

Received May 24, 2000; revision accepted Jul. 13, 2000.

For correspondence or reprints contact: George M. Segall, MD, Nuclear Medicine Service 115, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, 3801 Miranda Ave., Palo Alto, CA 94304.

*NOTE: FOR CE CREDIT, YOU CAN ACCESS THIS ACTIVITY THROUGH THE SNM WEB SITE (http://www.snm.org) UNTIL MAY 2001.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Neuro OncolHome page
A. A. Brandes, A. Tosoni, F. Spagnolli, G. Frezza, M. Leonardi, F. Calbucci, and E. Franceschi
Disease progression or pseudoprogression after concomitant radiochemotherapy treatment: Pitfalls in neurooncology
Neuro-oncol, January 1, 2008; 10(3): 361 - 367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
W. Chen
Clinical Applications of PET in Brain Tumors
J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2007; 48(9): 1468 - 1481.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
M. T. Wyss, N. Spaeth, G. Biollaz, J. Pahnke, P. Alessi, E. Trachsel, V. Treyer, B. Weber, D. Neri, and A. Buck
Uptake of 18F-Fluorocholine, 18F-FET, and 18F-FDG in C6 Gliomas and Correlation with 131I-SIP(L19), a Marker of Angiogenesis
J. Nucl. Med., April 1, 2007; 48(4): 608 - 614.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
S. Ceyssens, K. Van Laere, T. de Groot, J. Goffin, G. Bormans, and L. Mortelmans
[11C]Methionine PET, Histopathology, and Survival in Primary Brain Tumors and Recurrence
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2006; 27(7): 1432 - 1437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
C. Asao, Y. Korogi, M. Kitajima, T. Hirai, Y. Baba, K. Makino, M. Kochi, S. Morishita, and Y. Yamashita
Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Radiation-Induced Brain Injury for Differentiation from Tumor Recurrence
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2005; 26(6): 1455 - 1460.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
W.-Y. Guo
Is Current Imaging Good Enough to Differentiate Radiation-Induced Brain Injury from Tumor Recurrence?
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2005; 26(6): 1305 - 1305.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
M. Henze, A. Mohammed, H. P. Schlemmer, K. K. Herfarth, S. Hoffner, S. Haufe, W. Mier, M. Eisenhut, J. Debus, and U. Haberkorn
PET and SPECT for Detection of Tumor Progression in Irradiated Low-Grade Astrocytoma: A Receiver-Operating-Characteristic Analysis
J. Nucl. Med., April 1, 2004; 45(4): 579 - 586.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
P. A. Hein, C. J. Eskey, J. F. Dunn, and E. B. Hug
Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in the Follow-up of Treated High-Grade Gliomas: Tumor Recurrence versus Radiation Injury
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2004; 25(2): 201 - 209.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2000 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.