JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 41 No. 10 1689-1694
© 2000 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kolesnikov-Gauthier, H.
Right arrow Articles by Sulman, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kolesnikov-Gauthier, H.
Right arrow Articles by Sulman, C.

Evaluation of Toxicity and Efficacy of 186Re-Hydroxyethylidene Diphosphonate in Patients with Painful Bone Metastases of Prostate or Breast Cancer

Hélène Kolesnikov-Gauthier, Philippe Carpentier, Pascal Depreux, Philippe Vennin, Armel Caty and Charles Sulman

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Henri Mondor Hospital, Créteil; and Departments of Nuclear Medicine, Breast Disease, and Oncology-Urology, Centre Oscar-Lambret, Lille, France

Twenty-eight patients (12 men with prostate cancer, 16 women with breast cancer) were included in a phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy of 186Re-hydroxyethylidene diphosphonate (HEDP) on pain from bone metastasis and the toxicity of this agent. Methods: After intravenous administration of 1295 MBq 186Re-HEDP, the efficacy was evaluated by means of a daily log. Results: We observed an objective response in 67% of prostate cancer patients and in 36% of breast cancer patients. The mean duration of response was 45 d for prostate cancer patients and 24 d for breast cancer patients. No major adverse effects were observed. Marrow toxicity did not exceed grade 2 for white blood cells and grade 3 for platelets using National Cancer Institute criteria. Conclusion: 186Re-HEDP provides safe symptomatic relief of pain in prostate cancer patients. The benefit of this treatment is less clear in breast cancer patients. Further studies should be conducted to evaluate treatment by 186Re-HEDP at an earlier stage of the disease.

Key Words: bone metastasis • prostate carcinoma • breast carcinoma • radionuclide-targeted radiotherapy • 186Re

Received Oct. 19, 1999; revision accepted Feb. 16, 2000.

For correspondence or reprint requests contact: Charles Sulman, MD, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Oscar-Lambret, 1 rue Frederic Combemale, 59000 Lille, France.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AM J HOSP PALLIAT CAREHome page
H. Smith, A. Navani, and S. M. Fishman
Radiopharmaceuticals for palliation of painful osseous metastases
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, July 1, 2004; 21(4): 303 - 313.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
W. Brenner, W. U. Kampen, C. Brummer, C. von Forstner, M. Zuhayra, N. Czech, C. Muhle, and E. Henze
Bone Uptake Studies in Rabbits Before and After High-Dose Treatment with 153Sm-EDTMP or 186Re-HEDP
J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2003; 44(2): 247 - 251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2000 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.