HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Thie, J. A. Articles by Smith, G. T. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Thie, J. A. Articles by Smith, G. T.

The Diagnostic Utility of the Lognormal Behavior of PET Standardized Uptake Values in Tumors

Department of Radiology, Biomedical Imaging Center, The University of Tennessee Medical Center at Knoxville, Knoxville, Tennessee

A meta-analysis of data primarily from PET oncologic investigations using FDG PET was performed. Its purpose was to establish statistical features of the distributions of standardized uptake values (SUVs) as possible aids in the diagnostic process. Methods: We obtained 1536 values of oncologic markers from patient studies of 40 investigations in the literature. Statistical parameters were tabulated for analysis. Results: A significant observation is that, unlike skewed SUV histograms, log₁₀SUV has Gaussian behavior, which is not uncommon for biologic quantities. This was found for SUVs of FDG and 2 amino acids as well as a few other cancer markers. A possible model for explaining this is proposed. For FDG, the SD of the log₁₀SUVs for an average cancer category was 0.23. Examining data within the framework of the model points to physiologic factors as dominating SUV variability rather than PET protocols. When data for a single cancer category were available from multiple institutions, averages, s, disagree beyond chance expectations. Diagnostic utility suggestions include a universal linear relationship between sensitivity and severity, defined as SUV/, on semilogarithmic probability paper; a generic receiver-operating-characteristic curve for all cancers; using [log₁₀(_mal/_norm)] ÷ (_mal² + _norm²)^1/2 as a simple diagnostic effectiveness measure; and using Gaussian log₁₀SUVs to avoid erroneous P values. Conclusion: Using the logarithms of markers, such as SUVs, several advantages stemming from their Gaussian nature can be achieved with benefits ensuing to the diagnostic process.

Key Words: FDG • cancer • statistical analysis • standardized uptake value • PET

Received Aug. 13, 1999; revision accepted Feb. 1, 2000.

For correspondence or reprints contact: Joseph A. Thie, PhD, Biomedical Imaging Center, The University of Tennessee Medical Center at Knoxville, 1924 Alcoa Hwy., Knoxville, TN 37920.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. V.S.V. Neti and R. W. Howell Log Normal Distribution of Cellular Uptake of Radioactivity: Implications for Biologic Responses to Radiopharmaceuticals J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2006; 47(6): 1049 - 1058. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Thie Understanding the Standardized Uptake Value, Its Methods, and Implications for Usage J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2004; 45(9): 1431 - 1434. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Boellaard, N. C. Krak, O. S. Hoekstra, and A. A. Lammertsma Effects of Noise, Image Resolution, and ROI Definition on the Accuracy of Standard Uptake Values: A Simulation Study J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2004; 45(9): 1519 - 1527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]