|
|
||||||||
Departments of Nuclear Medicine and Surgery, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
The aim of this study was to compare FDG PET with a new monoclonal antibodybased imaging agent that comprises an anticarcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) monoclonal antibody Fab' fragment directly labeled with 99mTc. Methods: Twenty-eight patients who were previously treated for colorectal carcinoma and in whom recurrence was suspected were examined with FDG PET and immunoscintigraphy. The most common indications were an elevation of serum CEA (13 patients), suggestive lesions documented by CT (9 patients), sonography (4 patients), and severe constipation (2 patients). Planar imaging and SPECT were performed 46 h after intravenous injection of the new imaging agent. Whole-body PET was performed 4560 min after intravenous injection of FDG. The findings were confirmed by conventional diagnostic modalities, surgery, and histology. Results: Histology confirmed local tumor recurrence in 9 of 28 patients. Clinical follow-up or CT confirmed the presence of liver metastases in 9 patients and lymph node involvement, lung metastases, and bone metastases in 2 patients each. The new agent correctly detected 8 of 9 local recurrences, whereas FDG PET was able to detect all 9 cases and in 1 case was false-positive. Liver metastases were confirmed in 9 patients by FDG PET but in only 1 patient by the new agent. Two cases with lymph node metastases and 2 cases with lung metastases were correctly identified by FDG PET, but none were detected by the new agent. Finally, bone metastases were identified in 1 patient by FDG PET but not with the new agent, whereas bone marrow infiltration (n = 1) was diagnosed by both imaging modalities. Conclusion: These results indicate that FDG PET and 99mTc-labeled anti-CEA Fab' are suitable for the diagnosis of local recurrence of colorectal carcinoma but that FDG PET is clearly superior in the detection of distant metastases (liver, bone, and lung) and lymph node involvement.
Key Words: colorectal cancer monoclonal antibody Fab' fragments immunoscintigraphy FDG PET
Received Sep. 27, 1999; revision accepted Mar. 8, 2000.
For correspondence or reprints contact: Petra Willkomm, MD, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, D-53127 Bonn, Germany.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. J. Kelloff, K. A. Krohn, S. M. Larson, R. Weissleder, D. A. Mankoff, J. M. Hoffman, J. M. Link, K. Z. Guyton, W. C. Eckelman, H. I. Scher, et al. The Progress and Promise of Molecular Imaging Probes in Oncologic Drug Development Clin. Cancer Res., November 15, 2005; 11(22): 7967 - 7985. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Bipat, M. S. van Leeuwen, E. F. I. Comans, M. E. J. Pijl, P. M. M. Bossuyt, A. H. Zwinderman, and J. Stoker Colorectal Liver Metastases: CT, MR Imaging, and PET for Diagnosis--Meta-analysis Radiology, October 1, 2005; 237(1): 123 - 131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. G. Pfister, A. B. Benson III, and M. R. Somerfield Surveillance Strategies after Curative Treatment of Colorectal Cancer N. Engl. J. Med., June 3, 2004; 350(23): 2375 - 2382. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. Swanson Is an FDG-PET Scan the New Imaging Standard for Colon Cancer? Ann. Surg. Oncol., December 1, 2001; 8(10): 752 - 753. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. K. Libutti, H. R. Alexander Jr, P. Choyke, D. L. Bartlett, S. L. Bacharach, M. Whatley, F. Jousse, W. C. Eckelman, K. Kranda, R. D. Neumann, et al. A Prospective Study of 2-[18F] Fluoro-2-Deoxy-D-Glucose/Positron Emission Tomography Scan, 99mTc-Labeled Arcitumomab (CEA-Scan), and Blind Second-Look Laparotomy for Detecting Colon Cancer Recurrence in Patients With Increasing Carcinoembryonic Antigen Levels Ann. Surg. Oncol., December 1, 2001; 8(10): 779 - 786. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY | THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE |