JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 41 No. 10 1657-1663
© 2000 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Willkomm, P.
Right arrow Articles by Biersack, H.-J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Willkomm, P.
Right arrow Articles by Biersack, H.-J.

FDG PET and Immunoscintigraphy with 99mTc-Labeled Antibody Fragments for Detection of the Recurrence of Colorectal Carcinoma

Petra Willkomm, Hans Bender, Michael Bangard, Pan Decker, Frank Grünwald and Hans-Jürgen Biersack

Departments of Nuclear Medicine and Surgery, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany

The aim of this study was to compare FDG PET with a new monoclonal antibody–based imaging agent that comprises an anti–carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) monoclonal antibody Fab' fragment directly labeled with 99mTc. Methods: Twenty-eight patients who were previously treated for colorectal carcinoma and in whom recurrence was suspected were examined with FDG PET and immunoscintigraphy. The most common indications were an elevation of serum CEA (13 patients), suggestive lesions documented by CT (9 patients), sonography (4 patients), and severe constipation (2 patients). Planar imaging and SPECT were performed 4–6 h after intravenous injection of the new imaging agent. Whole-body PET was performed 45–60 min after intravenous injection of FDG. The findings were confirmed by conventional diagnostic modalities, surgery, and histology. Results: Histology confirmed local tumor recurrence in 9 of 28 patients. Clinical follow-up or CT confirmed the presence of liver metastases in 9 patients and lymph node involvement, lung metastases, and bone metastases in 2 patients each. The new agent correctly detected 8 of 9 local recurrences, whereas FDG PET was able to detect all 9 cases and in 1 case was false-positive. Liver metastases were confirmed in 9 patients by FDG PET but in only 1 patient by the new agent. Two cases with lymph node metastases and 2 cases with lung metastases were correctly identified by FDG PET, but none were detected by the new agent. Finally, bone metastases were identified in 1 patient by FDG PET but not with the new agent, whereas bone marrow infiltration (n = 1) was diagnosed by both imaging modalities. Conclusion: These results indicate that FDG PET and 99mTc-labeled anti-CEA Fab' are suitable for the diagnosis of local recurrence of colorectal carcinoma but that FDG PET is clearly superior in the detection of distant metastases (liver, bone, and lung) and lymph node involvement.

Key Words: colorectal cancer • monoclonal antibody Fab' • fragments • immunoscintigraphy • FDG PET

Received Sep. 27, 1999; revision accepted Mar. 8, 2000.

For correspondence or reprints contact: Petra Willkomm, MD, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, D-53127 Bonn, Germany.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
G. J. Kelloff, K. A. Krohn, S. M. Larson, R. Weissleder, D. A. Mankoff, J. M. Hoffman, J. M. Link, K. Z. Guyton, W. C. Eckelman, H. I. Scher, et al.
The Progress and Promise of Molecular Imaging Probes in Oncologic Drug Development
Clin. Cancer Res., November 15, 2005; 11(22): 7967 - 7985.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Bipat, M. S. van Leeuwen, E. F. I. Comans, M. E. J. Pijl, P. M. M. Bossuyt, A. H. Zwinderman, and J. Stoker
Colorectal Liver Metastases: CT, MR Imaging, and PET for Diagnosis--Meta-analysis
Radiology, October 1, 2005; 237(1): 123 - 131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
D. G. Pfister, A. B. Benson III, and M. R. Somerfield
Surveillance Strategies after Curative Treatment of Colorectal Cancer
N. Engl. J. Med., June 3, 2004; 350(23): 2375 - 2382.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
R. S. Swanson
Is an FDG-PET Scan the New Imaging Standard for Colon Cancer?
Ann. Surg. Oncol., December 1, 2001; 8(10): 752 - 753.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
S. K. Libutti, H. R. Alexander Jr, P. Choyke, D. L. Bartlett, S. L. Bacharach, M. Whatley, F. Jousse, W. C. Eckelman, K. Kranda, R. D. Neumann, et al.
A Prospective Study of 2-[18F] Fluoro-2-Deoxy-D-Glucose/Positron Emission Tomography Scan, 99mTc-Labeled Arcitumomab (CEA-Scan), and Blind Second-Look Laparotomy for Detecting Colon Cancer Recurrence in Patients With Increasing Carcinoembryonic Antigen Levels
Ann. Surg. Oncol., December 1, 2001; 8(10): 779 - 786.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2000 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.