JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 41 No. 10 1619-1626
© 2000 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Williamson, P. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Williamson, P. D.

Does Performing Image Registration and Subtraction in Ictal Brain SPECT Help Localize Neocortical Seizures?

Petra J. Lewis, Alan Siegel, Adrian M. Siegel, Colin Studholme, Jitka Sojkova, David W. Roberts, Vijay M. Thadani, Karen L. Gilbert, Terrance M. Darcey and Peter D. Williamson

Departments of Radiology, Neurology, and Neurosurgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire; and Department of Radiology, Yale Medical School, New Haven, Connecticut

Ictal brain SPECT (IS) findings in neocortical epilepsy (patients without mesiotemporal sclerosis) can be subtle. This study is aimed at assessing how the seizure focus identification was improved by the inclusion of individual IS and interictal brain SPECT (ITS)–MRI image registration as well as performing IS – ITS image subtraction. Methods: The study involved the posthoc analysis of 64 IS scans using 99mTc–ethyl cysteinate dimer that were obtained in 38 patients without mesiotemporal sclerosis but with or without other abnormalities on MRI. Radiotracer injection occurred during video-electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring. Patients were injected 2–80 s (median time, 13 s) after clinical or EEG seizure onset. All patients had sufficient follow-up to correlate findings with the SPECT results. All patients had ITS and MRI, including a coronal volume sequence used for registration. Image registration (IS and ITS to MRI) was performed using automated software. After normalization, IS – ITS subtraction was performed. The IS, ITS, and subtraction studies were read by 2 experienced observers who were unaware of the clinical data and who assessed the presence and localization of an identifiable seizure focus before and after image registration and subtraction. Correlation was made with video-EEG (surface and invasive) and clinical and surgical follow-up. Results: Probable or definite foci were identified in 38 (59%) studies in 33 (87%) patients. In 52% of the studies, the image registration aided localization, and in 58% the subtraction images contributed additional information. In 9%, the subtraction images confused the interpretation. In follow-up after surgery, intracranial EEG or video-EEG monitoring (or both) has confirmed close or reasonable localization in 28 (74%) patients. In 6 (16%) patients, SPECT indicated false seizure localization. Conclusion: Image registration and image subtraction improve the localization of neocortical seizure foci using IS, but close correlation with the original images is required. False localizations occur in a minority of patients.

Key Words: SPECT • epilepsy • image registration • 99mTc–ethyl cysteinate dimer

Received Oct. 29, 1999; revision accepted Mar. 8, 2000.

For correspondence or reprints contact: Petra J. Lewis, MD, Department of Radiology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, One Medical Center Dr., Lebanon, NH 03766.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
J. Sojkova, P. J. Lewis, A. H. Siegel, A. M. Siegel, D. W. Roberts, V. M. Thadani, and P. D. Williamson
Does Asymmetric Basal Ganglia or Thalamic Activation Aid in Seizure Foci Lateralization on Ictal SPECT Studies?
J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2003; 44(9): 1379 - 1386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
N. Boussion, C. Houzard, K. Ostrowsky, P. Ryvlin, F. Mauguiere, and L. Cinotti
Automated Detection of Local Normalization Areas for Ictal-Interictal Subtraction Brain SPECT
J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2002; 43(11): 1419 - 1425.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
C. Perault, D. Papathanassiou, H. Wampach, P. Vera, A. Kaminska, C. Chiron, P. Peruzzi, and J.-C. Liehn
Computer-Aided Intrapatient Comparison of Brain SPECT Images: The Gray-Level Normalization Issue Applied to Children with Epilepsy
J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2002; 43(6): 715 - 724.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2000 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.