JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 41 No. 1 149-160
© 2000 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stabin, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Konijnenberg, M. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stabin, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Konijnenberg, M. W.

Re-Evaluation of Absorbed Fractions for Photons and Electrons in Spheres of Various Sizes

Michael G. Stabin and Mark W. Konijnenberg

Departwnento de Energia Nuclear, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil
Mallinckrodt, Petten, The Netherlands

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Michael G. Stabin, PhD, Departamento de Energia Nuclear/UFPE, Av. Prof. Luiz Freire, 1000-Cidade Universitaria, CEP 50740-540, Recife PE, Brazil.

ABSTRACT

Absorbed fractions for unit density spheres in an infinite unit density medium, previously calculated for photon emitters and electron emitters,were reevaluated with the Monte Carlo codes EGS4 and MCNP4B. Methods: Activity was assumed to be distributed uniformly throughout the spheres, and absorbed fractions for self-irradiation were calculated at discrete photon and electron energies. Results: For electrons, the codes were in very good agreement with each other (±5%) and with published values, except at higher energies in the very smallest spheres, where some differences exceeded 10%. For photons, the codes were again in good agreement with each other but produced results that varied considerably from published MIRD values. For energies <1 MeV and sphere sizes <50 g, the absorbed fractions determined using the Monte Carlo codes were typically 20%–40% higher than values in MIRD 3 and 8. For energies >1 MeV, the Monte Carlo values were sometimes lower than those in the MIRD documents. Recommended values, generally the average results from the 2 Monte Carlo codes, are given for all sphere sizes and energies for both electrons and photons. Conclusion: The absorbed fractions calculated using the Monte Carlo codes should replace the older values and are helpful in evaluating tumor doses, doses to small organs, and other situations in which a uniform distribution of activity throughout a spherical structure of unit density can be assumed.

Key Words: radiation dosimetry • Monte Carlo • ß- and photon-emitting radionuclides







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2000 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.