JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 40 No. 7 1138-1142
© 1999 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Watanabe, N.
Right arrow Articles by Goodwin, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Watanabe, N.
Right arrow Articles by Goodwin, D. A.

Multiple Myeloma Evaluated with 201Tl Scintigraphy Compared with Bone Scintigraphy

Naoto Watanabe, Masashi Shimizu, Masanari Kageyama, Keiichi Tanimura, Seigo Kinuya, Noriyuki Shuke, Kunihiko Yokoyama, Norihisa Tonami, Akiharu Watanabe, Hikaru Seto and David A. Goodwin

Departments of Radiology and Internal Medicine, Toyama Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Toyama
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa
Department of Radiology, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa
Department of Internal Medicine, Himi City Hospital, Himi, Japan
Nuclear Medicine Service, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto
Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Naoto Watanabe, MD, Department of Radiology, Toyama Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Sugitani 2630, Toyama City, Japan 930-0194.

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical usefulness of 201Tl chloride Scintigraphy in the diagnostic evaluation of 20 patients with multiple myeloma (19/20 patients) or extramedullary plasmacytoma (1/20 patients) in comparison with bone scintigraphy. Methods: Both 201Tl and bone Scintigraphy were performed to obtain planar images on the same instrument. Results: 201Tl scintigraphy showed increased uptake in 15 of 20 patients (75%) and was negative in 5 of 20 patients (25%). In addition, 201Tl scintigraphy of multiple myeloma was more useful in detecting the lesions in 11 of 17 patients and less useful in 6 of 17 patients than bone scintigraphy. Conclusion: The combination of 201Tl and bone scintigraphy, compared with bone scintigraphy alone, shows promise in more accurately diagnosing multiple myeloma.

Key Words: multiple myeloma • 201Tl scintigraphy • bone scintigraphy




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. J. C. Angtuaco, A. B. T. Fassas, R. Walker, R. Sethi, and B. Barlogie
Multiple Myeloma: Clinical Review and Diagnostic Imaging
Radiology, April 1, 2004; 231(1): 11 - 23.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 1999 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.