JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 40 No. 6 972-976
© 1999 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Piepsz, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ham, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Piepsz, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ham, H.

Relative 99mTc-MAG3 Renal Uptake: Reproducibility and Accuracy

Amy Piepsz, Marianne Tondeur and Hamphrey Ham

Department of Radioisotopes, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire Saint-Pierre and Akademisch Ziekenhuis, Free Universities of Brussels, Belgium

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Amy Piepsz, MD, Department of Radioisotopes, CHU St. Pierre, 322 Rue Haute, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium.

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to estimate the reproducibility and accuracy of 99mTc-mercaptoacetyltriglycine (MAG3) relative percentage uptake. Methods: Reproducibility was evaluated on healthy volunteers who were submitted twice to a 99mTc-MAG3 renographic study, which used different uptake algorithms, different background corrections and different time intervals. Accuracy was evaluated in a group of patients with symmetrical or asymmetrical relative renal function, who underwent both 99mTc-dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) and 99mTc-MAG3 studies, using the DMSA relative percentage uptake as a reference. Results and Conclusion: The methods that combined the best reproducibility and accuracy for estimating 99mTc-MAG3 left-to-right uptake ratio were the integral method, with subrenal or perirenal background correction, and the Patlak-Rutland plot. The use of the integral method without background correction introduced a systematic bias, whereas the slope method resulted in high variability. Therefore these methods cannot be recommended.

Key Words: 99mTc-mercaptoacetyltriglycine • 99mTc-dimercaptosuccinic acid • relative renal uptake • reproducibility • accuracy







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 1999 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.